• Comment

FAA amends no-fly order

UPDATE: FAA to allow news media aircraft

Posted: April 3, 2013 - 1:55pm

The Federal Aviation Administration has amended its temporary flight restriction over the Mayflower oil spill area to allow media access, said spokesman Lynn Lunsford in email.

"We amended it because there is no reason to keep media out," Lunsford said.

The order was amended shortly after it was established Wednesday.

"It should have contained a provision to allow media overflights from the beginning, so we corrected it as soon as we noticed the error," Lunsford said.

Lunsford provided a document that says, in part, exceptions are made if "The aircraft is carrying properly accredited news representatives, and, prior to entering the area, a flight plan is filed with the appropriate FAA or ATC facility specified in the Notice to Airmen and the operation is conducted above the altitude used by the disaster relief aircraft, unless otherwise authorized by the official in charge of on scene emergency response activities."

Any media aircraft must still "coordinate with the site manager, but they can't be kept out of the area," he wrote.

"We are cooperating with the FAA to ensure the area is safe," said Kim Jordan, spokesperson for ExxonMobil.

Correction: Lynn Lunsford's name was misspelled in the original version of this story.

###

The Federal Aviation Administration has put a no fly zone over the Mayflower oil spill, according to administration's website.

The flight restrictions started Monday and is ongoing, according to the website. The order restricts flying in airspace at or below 1,000 feet.

"Temporary flight restrictions are in effect for oil pipeline rupture only relief aircraft operations underway of Tom Suhrhoff are authorized in the airspace," according to the notice.

An FAA spokesman said the orders are usually set up by disaster response managers. 

A no-fly zone was put in place during a massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.

  • Comment
Comments (41) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Igor Rabinowitz
9185
Points
Igor Rabinowitz 04/03/13 - 02:02 pm
9
1
Because

An aerial photo would summarize the scope and that would make Exxon sad.

ARVoiceofLogic
5459
Points
ARVoiceofLogic 04/03/13 - 02:15 pm
8
1
We can't have the world's

largest company sad can we? Not with all that potential campaign money at stake.

InsGuru
5631
Points
InsGuru 04/03/13 - 02:15 pm
4
2
There's one out there

I saw one earlier someone showed me.

ucantbserious
30354
Points
ucantbserious 04/03/13 - 02:29 pm
4
1
Yep

Nothing influences the feds like big money.

conwaygerl
6062
Points
conwaygerl 04/03/13 - 02:20 pm
6
1
There is already aerial footage

http://arkansasmatters.com/fulltext?nxd_id=650192

I just wish they would have made the area a no-spill zone a week before making it a no-fly zone.

ucantbserious
30354
Points
ucantbserious 04/03/13 - 02:29 pm
3
0
Thanks for sharing!

That is good quality recordings.

Guy Moore
83
Points
Guy Moore 04/03/13 - 02:40 pm
3
1
Relief Aircraft

Yeah for relief aircraft. That explanation sounds totally legit and completely non-influenced by money AND/OR the need to cover anything up.

crypted quill
11047
Points
crypted quill 04/03/13 - 02:47 pm
2
2
YEP! The Truth is Out

YEP!
The Truth is Out There... and It Hurts!

ucantbserious
30354
Points
ucantbserious 04/03/13 - 02:53 pm
4
1
ucantbserious
30354
Points
ucantbserious 04/03/13 - 03:08 pm
4
1
haha

Apparently someone from Exxon has registered at the LCD. I'm seeing a lot of spot-on comments getting some undeserved thumbs down.

Back to Top