Jurors will hear testimonies after a recess today in the trial case against Michael Fowler, who faces a negligent homicide charge in the death of juvenile Garrett Martin.
Authorities said Martin, 12, was killed when the ATV he was driving at Burgess Lane in Wooster was hit head-on by a Dodge Ram pickup truck driven by Fowler, 28, of Springfield.
Fowler allegedly fled the scene, but was located about one hour later by police in Morrilton.
Preliminary reports were that Fowler was intoxicated at the time of the incident.
Shortly after the incident, a man who said he was the brother of a passenger in Fowler's vehicle called police.
The caller told police he forced his way out of Fowler's vehicle.
Prosecutors and the defense excused seven jurors in jury selection before noon Wednesday.
One juror asked to be excused, saying he could not remain objective because of a past incident involving a drunk driver.
Another asked to be excused due to the nature of photographs that would be shown by prosecutors later in the trial.
The remaining dismissed jurors were requests of prosecutors and Fowler's defense attorney, Lynn Plemmons.
The judge presiding over the case is Judge Charles Clawson.

Comments (6)
Add commentThis is why ATV's aren't
This is why ATV's aren't legal for roadways (and why alcohol isn't legal for roadways too mind you). Aren't you are supposed to be 16 to drive them? Tragic accident that could of been prevented on so many levels and we'd still have one of our youth.
Won't Start
The whole thing up again the kid paid a big price for being in the wrong place at the wrong time and Drunky McLeave the Scene needs to get his due too.
There are zero excuses for
There are zero excuses for driving drunk. None. It is 100% totally preventable. DWI should be a capital offense punishable when convicted by public hanging on the courthouse lawn. After a few hangings I think we could nip this in the bud.
And that would be yes, I have had a loved one needlessly killed by a drunk driver so I have a biased view, and freely admit it.
I agree 357 - there are zero excuses and I will admit
when I was younger I did not understand this, and drove when I had been drinking. Then a very close friend lost her daughter to a drunk driver, a beautiful, intelligent, lovely girl whose value could not be calculated. It destroyed my friends life for many years, and left scars which never healed. It caused the end of her marriage and changed her life indefinitely. It was then I realized the seriousness of the act of drinking and driving, or driving when impaired. I started then only imbibing while at home or when I had a driver or public transportation available. I've never been arrested but have been stopped at several road block checks and always passed. I am grateful for learning a lesson so young, but at a cost which was horrible.
I'm not for public hangings, but I am for serious consequences for those who abuse the public trust (privilege of driving), especially when they flee and attempt to cover up the tragedy they caused as in this case.
Agreed
Very well said, reader.
Verdict's in
.
Well, not a public hanging
Well, not a public hanging but certainly a stiff sentence. As noted, there are no winners in this case . . . and all totally avoidable.