• Syndicate content
  • Comment

Arkansas House overrides veto of 12-week abortion ban

Abortion rights proponents have already said they'll sue to block the 12-week ban from taking effect.

Posted: March 6, 2013 - 3:26pm
(AP Photo/Danny Johnston)
Sen. Jason Rapert, R-Conway, speaks in the senate chamber at the Arkansas state Capitol in Little Rock, Ark., Tuesday, March 5, 2013. The Arkansas Senate voted Tuesday to override Gov. Mike Beebe’s veto of Rapert's legislation that would ban most abortions from the 12th week of pregnancy onward and would give the state the most restrictive abortion laws in the country.

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas House on Wednesday voted to override Democratic Gov. Mike Beebe's veto of a bill that would ban most abortions from the 12th week of pregnancy onward, giving the state the country's most restrictive abortion laws and setting the stage for a certain court challenge.

A day after the Republican-led state Senate voted to override Beebe's veto, the GOP-controlled House voted 56-33 to do the same. Only a simple majority was needed in each chamber. The bill was led by Sen. Jason Rapert, R-Conway.

The vote comes less than a week after the Legislature voted to override the governor's veto of a separate bill banning most abortions starting in the 20th week of pregnancy. That bill took effect immediately after the final override vote, whereas the 12-week ban wouldn't take effect until this summer.

Abortion rights proponents have already said they'll sue to block the 12-week ban from taking effect. Beebe warned lawmakers that both measures are likely to fail in court and that the state would end up wasting money defending them if they became law.

Beebe rejected both measures for the same reasons, saying they were unconstitutional and contradicted the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion until a fetus could viably survive outside the womb. A fetus is generally considered viable at 22 to 24 weeks.

The 12-week ban would prohibit abortions from the point when a fetus' heartbeat can typically be detected using an abdominal ultrasound. It includes exemptions for rape, incest, the life of the mother and highly lethal fetal disorders. The 20-week prohibition, which is based on the disputed claim that a fetus can feel pain by the 20th week and therefore deserves protection from abortion, includes all of the same exemptions except for fetal disorders.

The measure is among several abortion restrictions lawmakers have backed since Republicans won control of the House and Senate in the November election. Republicans hold 21 of the 35 Senate seats, and 51 of the 100 seats in the House. It takes a simple majority in both chambers to override.

Beebe has signed into law one of those measures, a prohibition on most abortion coverage by insurers participating in the exchange created under the health care law.

Unlike the 20-week ban, which took effect immediately, the 12-week restriction won't take effect until 90 days after the House and Senate adjourn. Lawmakers aren't expected to wrap up this year's session until later this month or April.

In vetoing both measures, Beebe has cited the costs to the state if it has to defend either ban in court. The American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas has vowed to sue if the state enacts the 12-week ban and the group said it was considering legal action over the 20-week restriction as well.

Beebe noted that the state paid nearly $148,000 to attorneys for plaintiffs who successfully challenged a 1997 late-term abortion ban.

The original version of Rapert's bill would have banned abortions as early as six weeks into a pregnancy, but he changed the measure after facing resistance from some lawmakers worried that it would require an invasive procedure.

Women who have abortions would not face prosecution under Rapert's bill, but doctors who perform abortions in violation of the 12-week ban could have their medical licenses revoked.

 

  • Comment

Comments (14)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
JohnNabholz
13
Points
JohnNabholz 03/06/13 - 06:06 pm
0
6

ARKANSAS HUMAN HEARTBEAT PROTECTION ACT

Have you noticed how Andrew Demillo (AP Reporter) and the rest of the news stopped referring to the bill by its title?

By not emphasing in the title the fact that it saves the life of a human with a heartbeat, it makes it all about the mother who is going through an extremely tough situation, rather than the baby.

Here is the full title
http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/assembly/2013/2013R/Bills/SB134.pdf

arkansan
461
Points
arkansan 03/06/13 - 07:47 pm
2
0
BearFan4
1960
Points
BearFan4 03/06/13 - 07:56 pm
4
0

Can we PLEASE get back to

Can we PLEASE get back to legislative issues that ACTUALLY MATTER now???

RWeDoneYet
110
Points
RWeDoneYet 03/06/13 - 08:11 pm
4
1

Not yet.

They will cut it to 6 weeks and then 3 weeks.

Same old song and dance. They need to set up the White Conservative (tea party) agenda a little more.

Rapert is a joke we have to live with. He has the ear of GOD. Just ask him.

He'll be praying for me tomorrow.

artlet
3
Points
artlet 03/06/13 - 08:13 pm
1
6

Heart Beat Bill

I have always voted, but never been involved in a political campaign. I certainly made the right decision when I chose to to support Senator Jason Rapert. I am so proud of him for his willingness to fight for human life. In this era of "entitlement", a beating heart -an unborn human being- is certainly entitled to a chance at LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

turdferguson
310
Points
turdferguson 03/06/13 - 10:28 pm
6
2

I've got a hundred dollar

I've got a hundred dollar bill that says your parents or your grandparents have or are receiving Social Security or Medicare.

Are they part of the "entitlement" problem? I'm sure if you asked them, they'd tell you they earned it.

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 03/06/13 - 10:33 pm
1
5

and

Unpublished

ask them if they've earned a cell phone and broadband internet.

turdferguson
310
Points
turdferguson 03/07/13 - 10:10 am
5
0

Were you screaming about cell

Were you screaming about cell phones and Internet service during W's or Clinton's presidencies? Probably not. Because the same law that provides for those was in place during both of their tenures.

But I suppose that facts don't matter.

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 03/07/13 - 10:22 am
0
2

question, turd

Unpublished

Am I screaming now?

ARVoiceofLogic
4521
Points
ARVoiceofLogic 03/07/13 - 10:29 am
3
0

Mr. Ferguson

Please stop posting meaningless facts around here. It is a waste of time. Obama personally drives to every poor neighborhood and hands out free Galaxy SIIIs (the superior phone) to every poor person he sees. He watches youtube videos with them and buys a few beers and disappears in a flash of smoke. Nothing you post will convince me otherwise. Mitt Romney told me so. 47%!

Back to Top