• Syndicate content
  • Comment

Conway officers' actions match policy, police say

Posted: March 4, 2013 - 6:38pm
Officials process the scene of an officer-involved shooting outside Plaza Pointe apartments in Conway Sunday. Officers placed on leave were following policy, according to police. COURTNEY SPRADLIN PHOTO
Officials process the scene of an officer-involved shooting outside Plaza Pointe apartments in Conway Sunday. Officers placed on leave were following policy, according to police. COURTNEY SPRADLIN PHOTO

Conway Police Department officials said Monday their officers responded appropriately when they shot a man multiple times as he charged an officer with a knife outside an apartment building Sunday.

Conway police spokeswoman La Tresha Woodruff said four officers involved in the altercation outside Plaza Pointe apartments on Market Plaza Drive in Conway are on leave and under administrative inquiry, "as pursuant to procedure in these matters."

The suspect is at a Little Rock hospital receiving medical treatment, according to police.

The department's use of force policy requires an internal investigation to be initiated any time an officer is associated with serious injury or death due to police force or police action.

According to the policy, Arkansas State Police may be requested by the police chief to assume responsibility for any criminal investigation, should one arise from a use of force incident.

Woodruff said Monday the department is interviewing involved officers Rachel Hanson, Andrew Burningham, James Burroughs and Steven Culliford, who were placed on leave Sunday.

Once the department has completed its internal review, the file will be given to the prosecuting attorney to determine if further action is needed, according to Woodruff.

Woodruff said witness and police testimonies indicate officers followed the department's Use of Force Continuum policy, which includes a chart with progressive levels of police force.

At Level 1, the continuum requires officers to make their presence known to a subject.

At Level 2, police are to give a subject verbal commands such as to drop his or her weapon.

Woodruff said in this case, the subject wielding a knife did not comply.

At Level 3, officers are to deploy non-lethal and less harmful controls such as spray and tasers.

Woodruff said the suspect was undeterred by the taser, and officers moved to "deadly force" at Level 5.

The policy states an officer will escalate levels of force as the offender escalates resistance.

Woodruff said the proximity of the suspect to the officer who deployed the taser put the officer in imminent danger when the suspect charged her with a knife.

Level 4 in the continuum calls for impact weapons such as police batons and less lethal munitions.

Conway officers who are involved in police force that results in death or serious injury are required to undergo psychological debriefing and counseling, according to the policy.

  • Comment

Comments (39)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
David
110
Points
David 03/04/13 - 09:10 pm
5
1

Take care of our own

This is likely to be a difficult time for officers directly involved in this incident and for those who work with them and care for them. Whether you respect law enforcement officers or do not, they are special people who do a lot of demanding and unpleasant work that most of us would not do and most choose not to do. It's not easy to be selected to serve in law enforcement and more difficult to stay on the job for very long. They deserve our support and when we are honest with ourselves we admit we need them. Like most of us, they work in an organization with policies and procedures that they are expected to follow yet they have to have the flexibility to interact with people most of us choose to avoid. It's a tough job. In the incident at Plaza Pointe, I think the officers made decisions that were appropriate for the moment. However, those decisions were not necessarily the right decisions and I'm saddened that they and the person they shot will suffer as a result. I hope the CPD will continue to improve as another result.

truthbetold
1482
Points
truthbetold 03/05/13 - 09:38 am
0
4

Please tell me....

David, what do you mean by this?
"In the incident at Plaza Pointe, I think the officers made decisions that were appropriate for the moment. However, those decisions were not necessarily the right decisions and I'm saddened that they and the person they shot will suffer as a result"
-didn't you just contradict yourself there? Or are you saying I agree with what you did but it wasn't the right thing to do? Again Double standards from armchair quaterbacking. Unless you know more about the situation than you portray while respecting their jobs in one hand but playing devils advocate in the other, I'm curious to what you are really trying to say because it seems you went about it lightly so as to not ruffle feathers. I on the other hand am pretty blunt and like for people to know where I stand wether it's with me or not I lose no sleep over it. But the question remains....what wrong decision did they make? And since you are saying it was a wrong decision then please do tell...what was the right decision when a man asked several times to drop a knife, along with being tazed, and yet still charges at another Officer with a knife in a distance that is close enough to be lethal...what would the correct response be?

Respectfully though I do agree with you on "taking care of our own". We as a community should trust and stand behind them because like the criminals police often put away everyday shouldn't we as a community also pressume them guilty unless proven otherwise?

PEARList
2008
Points
PEARList 03/04/13 - 09:26 pm
5
0

Legally speaking...

"appropriate for the moment" and "right decision" are the same thing. An officer's actions can only be judged, legally speaking, based on his/her knowledge and position at the time of the incident. The court can't look at facts or circumstances that were learned after the fact but not known at the time by the officers. While the court of public opinion is almost exclusively made up of "Monday morning quarterbacking", the law doesn't allow it in criminal proceedings.

crypted quill
9988
Points
crypted quill 03/05/13 - 09:50 am
3
4

If you're "trained" to keep a

If you're "trained" to keep a certain distance between a knife-wielding suspect...why was the officer in violation of that distance... Hmmmm?

How can you say that the policy was matched?

Don't give me the phony " he lunged toward me " so we shot him in the back defense.

PEARList
2008
Points
PEARList 03/05/13 - 10:02 am
2
1

facts

"Don't give me the phony ' he lunged toward me ' so we shot him in the back defense."

If you can't make a point without skewing the facts, you're clearly just typing to see your text on the internets. Congrats!

truthbetold
1482
Points
truthbetold 03/05/13 - 10:12 am
3
2

CQ and facts...

HA! Thats good! But for some reason the 2 just never go good together.

crypted quill
9988
Points
crypted quill 03/05/13 - 10:20 am
1
4

Why don't you two go play

Why don't you two go play Angry Birds...you know something closer to your skill level?

Lord knows carrying the water for the CPD ain't your forte.

truthbetold
1482
Points
truthbetold 03/05/13 - 11:18 am
2
2

see...

fact: I beat all the levels at angry bird and I carry towels not water! It just doesn't go together well CQ, you and facts that is. Did Obama make you this way or was this from birth? Oh yeah I just went there!

crypted quill
9988
Points
crypted quill 03/05/13 - 11:27 am
2
3

Thank you... for proving the

Thank you...

for proving the fact that ad hominem attacks are a sign of low intelligence.

truthbetold
1482
Points
truthbetold 03/05/13 - 11:31 am
2
1

are you sure it's that ...

or when someone can't comprehend sarcasm? I rest my case....

Back to Top