UCA baseball team wins twice, advances to Southland Conference semifinals

Hendrix's Elizabeth Krug wins NCAA Division III heptathlon

  • Syndicate content
  • Comment

Update: FCSO reports $30K blow to budget for non-renewed employees

Posted: February 23, 2013 - 8:20pm

Feb. 25 update: Grievance hearing has been scheduled for Mar. 7, Shock says.

-----------------------------------------

 

Officials with the Faulkner County Sheriff’s Office have reported the loss of nearly $30,000 to its budget for four deputies not rehired to their positions, January, following the swearing-in of new sheriff Andy Shock. And with no date set for a grievance hearing, the amount continues to increase daily.

Shock said in January, following his department overhaul, that no one was fired from the department, but six employees were not re-hired to their positions. Those employees were notified of their non-selection via hand-delivered letters. Some recipients had served decades with the department.

Four of those employees requested a grievance hearing, though county officials have yet to set a date.

As of Friday, the employees had drawn $26,340.91 in salaries and benefits.

Shock is the official defendant in the case with the hearing to be heard by County Judge Allen Dodson and a grievance board comprised of five members of the quorum court. At the hearing, the board and county judge must decide whether the deputies were wrongfully relieved of their responsibilities with FCSO. Michael Rainwater, a Little Rock attorney retained by the county, will represent Shock in proceedings; county employees are responsible for their own legal representation at the hearing.

Shock said he has been in constant contact with Dodson since his appointment to the judgeship Jan. 31, and had also prompted former County Judge Preston Scroggin to set a date.

“(The employees) only had so many days to file a grievance, and on those forms they’ve got to state why they are filing,” Shock said. “They waited until the last day to file and didn’t file a reason. That right there could have made the request null and void, but it didn’t.”

Nearly two months later, Shock said he is still waiting on a date, though he isn’t sure why. Any questions of legal liability were addressed before any action was taken against the employees, Shock said.

Salaries for those no longer contracted to work are being paid from the department’s 2013 budget. The department is working on a “tight budget,” Shock said, and he hopes to use “every penny to the best of his ability.”

“We have only allocated ‘x’ amount of dollars in our budget for salaries, so not only are we paying for people that don’t already work here, it’s coming out of the pool for people who do work here,” Shock said.

“I have appreciated the sheriff’s patience,” Dodson said Friday, noting the delay in scheduling has been due in part to the recent vacancy of the position of county judge, and also to legal questions that have “required some research.”

“We didn’t want to create any individual cause of action,” Dodson said. “We don’t want to deny anyone a hearing if they are entitled to one and we have been working to determine whether procedures were followed.”

Dodson offered that should the department find themselves behind on budget, he was prepared to offer to help offset the cost.

But Shock said saving money is a top priority. “I don’t want to be in a position to ask for more money and we will do everything we can to prevent from doing that,” Shock said. “These four employees cost the county roughly $160,000 a year. The further this rocks on, the more money we are out.”

Dodson said Friday he hopes to schedule a date by Thursday this week, or no later than a week from Thursday.

(Megan Reynolds is a staff writer and can be reached by phone at 501-505-1277 or by e-mail at megan.reynolds@thecabin.net. To comment on this story and others, visit www.thecabin.net.)

  • Comment

Comments (15)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
passthesalt
363
Points
passthesalt 02/24/13 - 09:46 am
7
2

I'm not surprised

When this issue was first published, I posted that I understood why they were being paid until the grievance hearing, but the Quorum Court needed to set a hearing date SOON, because assuming the employees would lose their grievance, the money could be better directed to county services. I work for the state and have had fellow employees tell me "you're not paying the bill." Excuse me, I AM a taxpayer so I AM paying the bill, and the Quorum Court members are paying these salaries, too. They are just too ignorant to give a F.

357
1393
Points
357 02/24/13 - 09:18 pm
6
3

All of your ranting is for

All of your ranting is for naught, the Quorum Court does not set the date of the hearings. The county judge does.

crypted quill
9968
Points
crypted quill 02/24/13 - 10:10 am
7
5

"... no one was fired from

"... no one was fired from the department, but six employees were not re-hired to their positions."

HOLY COW!

Arkansas/Faulkner County, Land of Sweet Tea for austerity.
Tea-pot-heads (Konway Krazy Klown) 'Keep America American'...hey Vern, ya know what I mean?

NoKidding
2426
Points
NoKidding 02/24/13 - 10:43 am
5
7

CQ

We told you to stay away from the brown acid.

crypted quill
9968
Points
crypted quill 02/24/13 - 05:20 pm
4
6

Nah, never the artificial

Nah, never the artificial stuff, only high on life Kid.

How does that saying go?
'Fools who do not die early die without hope, go to hell, and face the second death.'

Something like that.

krg2
3103
Points
krg2 02/24/13 - 01:49 pm
7
1

"...Shock said in January,

"...Shock said in January, following his department overhaul, that no one was fired from the department, but six employees were not re-hired to their positions. Those employees were notified of their non-selection via hand-delivered letters. Some recipients had served decades with the department."

HAHAHAHA...talk about bizarro-world government speak...and, of course, BS! I especially love that they were notified of their 'non-selection' via hand-delivered letters. Another fine example of how to [filtered word] on campaign promises and demonstrate just how dumb ya think your constituents are.

Mostly when I vote for Sheriff, I don't have a clue who the candidates are; which results in either a pass on voting or a voting preference from a respected friend. Lucky for me the next time I vote I'll remember that Andy thinks I'm an idiot. Keep your public promises or step up and explain in real-world speak why your action justifies otherwise...and that goes to the rest of you elected ones too.

Reaganesque
4133
Points
Reaganesque 02/24/13 - 03:42 pm
0
0

Well...........

He is a smart man Kim....

he knows people such as you, read, sla and so on, just whine about the way the world goes around. IT's all you liberls know. :)

Old Man
23
Points
Old Man 02/25/13 - 07:56 am
8
2

Will things change, or stay the same.

Listen folks, I've lived in this county for many, many years. Let's call this for what it is; Mr. Shock fired these people because they openly supported and or voted for another candidate; its really just that simple. The County Judge and his Court can't order Shock to put the deputies/employees back to work. Like it or not Shock is the most powerful man in the county. A County Sheriff is highest elected official in the county. What the County Judge and Court can do, if they want to be fair, and this is a question that remains to be seen, they can advise Mr. Shock, he will NOT receive money for the deputies/employees that he had fired; "oh, sorry, not rehired" to fill their open slots, that he will have to operate short handed. and the county will also continue to pay the deputies/employees that was fired, "oh, sorry, not rehired" their wages, retirement, and health insurance. Do not let some snake of an attorney tell you they can't do this, because the County Judge and his Court can! I think if this is done, Mr. Shock will rethink his position of firing; "oh sorry, not rehiring" the deputies/employees in question.

357
1393
Points
357 02/25/13 - 08:32 am
8
1

Come on Old Man . . .

For someone that's lived in this county a long time you seem to think this is something new. A new sheriff coming in and weeding out some of the hired help is nothing new, in fact, it's done after every single sheriff's administrative change in every single county. Karl Byrd did it before Andy Shock, Marty Montgomery did it before that, and Bob Blankenship did it.

Not only do new sheriff's make personnel changes when they get elected, county judges do it, county clerks do it, county treasurers do it, and mayors do it. That's why the call it a "new administration."

I'm neither a fan nor supporter of the new sheriff, but fussing at him for doing what is rightfully his to do is just petty.

krg2
3103
Points
krg2 02/25/13 - 12:43 pm
7
1

"I'm neither a fan nor

"I'm neither a fan nor supporter of the new sheriff, but fussing at him for doing what is rightfully his to do is just petty."

Don't make campaign promises that you don't intend to keep, don't hide behind 'government speak' (tell us in plain English why he 'fired' these folks) and don't complain when we call you out on your blatant bs. I'd respect that a whole lot more...even if I completely disagree with his reasoning.

...plus just because he can do it doesn't make it any less petty.

Back to Top