• Syndicate content
  • Comment

Rapert changing 'heartbeat' bill

Posted: February 5, 2013 - 9:25pm
Sen. Jason Rapert, R-Conway, right, speaks during a news conference at the Arkansas state Capitol in Little Rock, Ark., Monday, Feb. 4, 2013. Rapert is the sponsor of a bill that would ban abortions if a fetal heartbeat is detected. (AP Photo/Danny Johnston)  AP
AP
Sen. Jason Rapert, R-Conway, right, speaks during a news conference at the Arkansas state Capitol in Little Rock, Ark., Monday, Feb. 4, 2013. Rapert is the sponsor of a bill that would ban abortions if a fetal heartbeat is detected. (AP Photo/Danny Johnston)

LITTLE ROCK — An Arkansas senator proposing to ban most abortions in Arkansas said Tuesday he’s amending his bill to prohibit the procedure if a fetal heartbeat is detected using an abdominal ultrasound, a move that would ease the restriction by several weeks into a pregnancy.

Sen. Jason Rapert said he planned to change the legislation to address concerns raised by other lawmakers after a House panel voted to delay consideration of the proposed ban. The Senate passed the abortion ban last week.

Rapert’s original proposal would have banned abortions as early as six weeks into a pregnancy, and opponents have said the only way to detect a heartbeat at that point is by using a vaginal probe. Rapert said requiring an abdominal ultrasound would ban the procedure as early as 10 to 12 weeks into a pregnancy. The proposal would still include an exemption for rape, incest and the life of the mother.

“We would protect a child when there is a detectible heartbeat with an abdominal ultrasound,” Rapert, R-Conway, told reporters.

Rapert’s original proposal won easy approval in the Senate, and is one of several new abortion restrictions being considered after Republicans won control of the House and Senate in last year’s election. But Democratic Gov. Mike Beebe and Republican House Speaker Davy Carter have raised concerns about the constitutionality of Rapert’s measure.

A spokesman for Beebe, who has not said whether he opposes Rapert’s bill, said the governor would look at the amendment as he reviews whether the “heartbeat” bill is constitutional.

Rapert announced the change hours after the House Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee tabled his bill for later discussion. Rep. John Burris, the panel’s chairman, said the legislation was tabled over various concerns about the proposed restriction.

“I’ll need to read it, but the concepts I think are much more in the field of where it needs to be,” Burris, R-Harrison, told reporters.

Burris said he believes the changes likely won’t address complaints that the legislation would invite lawsuits. Opponents have said Rapert’s proposal runs afoul of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion up until viability, usually at 22 to 24 weeks.

Burris said, however, he’s not worried about the threat of lawsuits.

“The threat of litigation is not a reason to not pass a bill,” Burris said.

Rapert said he’s confident the measure will be approved by the House panel. Democrats control 11 of the 20 seats on the committee.

“I think it’ll be a better bill and I think it’s still good because it’s still better than the situation we have now,” Rapert said.

The changes to Rapert’s legislation come a day after the House approved two other abortion restrictions. One would ban abortions at 20 weeks of pregnancy and the other would prohibit insurers participating in the exchange created under the federal health care law from covering abortions. Both are now pending before a Senate committee.

  • Comment

Comments (9)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
reader
12571
Points
reader 02/05/13 - 10:29 pm
2
1

Never give up . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

no never give up. you lose the game if you ever give up . . . . . .

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 02/05/13 - 11:12 pm
1
8

compromise

Unpublished

and it appears it isn't good enough for those that prey on the least of us.

reader
12571
Points
reader 02/05/13 - 11:40 pm
11
2

yes, compromise

always the intent of your input.

"it appears it isn't good enough for those that prey on the least of us"

I have a clear position on abortion and it has been stated before in my comments.

State Senator Rapert, is trying in any way he can, to achieve a success against the constitutional rights of real women. Women I work with, live next door to. grew up with, my Mom, my sisters, my aunts, my female loved ones of all varieties, whose life details I cannot know in all detail. I prefer to defer to the woman herself, as I cannot walk in her shoes, nor reflect in your aluminum hat.

Trin
1018
Points
Trin 02/06/13 - 08:06 am
9
0

Respect. And thank you.

Respect.

And thank you.

Bobo
1247
Points
Bobo 02/06/13 - 10:17 am
1
5
tenther
133
Points
tenther 02/07/13 - 12:40 pm
2
3

Hmmm

I wonder what your clear position on abortion would be if your mom had elected to have one when she was pregnant with you.

crypted quill
9962
Points
crypted quill 02/07/13 - 01:34 pm
2
0

BRILLIANT! 'Tenther' You fit

BRILLIANT!

'Tenther' You fit like a glove with the other...punchinellos.

Bobo
1247
Points
Bobo 02/06/13 - 10:16 am
1
6
BuzzBy
17777
Points
BuzzBy 02/06/13 - 08:41 am
3
1

I'm Not Getting the Point

Unpublished

Of all this
Checking below it looks like we are not having a huge abortion problem
Looking at these stats:

States ranked by rates of pregnancy among women age 15-19 (pregnancies per thousand):

1.Nevada (113)
2.Arizona (104)
3.Mississippi (103)
4.New Mexico (103)
5.Texas (101)
6.Florida (97)
7.California (96)
8.Georgia (95)
9.North Carolina (95)
10.Arkansas (93)
States ranked by rates of live births among women age 15-19 (births per thousand):

1.Mississippi (71)
2.Texas (69)
3.Arizona (67)
4.Arkansas (66)
5.New Mexico (66)
6.Georgia (63)
7.Louisiana (62)
8.Nevada (61)
9.Alabama (61)
10.Oklahoma (60)

September 2006 report by the Guttmacher Institute compiled teenage pregnancy statistics in the United States gathered state by state in 2000. Based on available data, below are listings of states ranked by pregnancy and birth rates.

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 02/06/13 - 09:49 am
1
5

so

Unpublished

Only teens have abortions? Is that the implication?

We're all already born, so who really cares about abortion?

Back to Top