• Syndicate content
  • Comment

Religious visitors barred from school lunch visits

Local youth ministers told not to visit students during lunch while school district reviews legality

Posted: January 17, 2013 - 7:25pm
Back | Next

Local youth ministers and pastors can no longer visit students at lunchtime in Conway schools after an organization sent a letter in October complaining about the visits, school officials said Thursday.

About 16 representatives from area churches and religious organizations met in a closed-door meeting between them and superintendent Greg Murry on Thursday morning.

“A lot of things were circulating last night on Twitter and Facebook, and people were talking about ministers being banned from school,” said Conway K-Life board president Jeff Standridge. “There’s a lot of misinformation out there right now. (But) there is a suspension of these activities until they could complete the review.”

The issue stems from a Freedom From Religion Foundation letter dated Oct. 26. The Foundation, a nonprofit group that advocates for separation of state and church nationwide, sent Murry a letter saying there is a “constitutional violation in Conway Public Schools” in allowing youth ministers to visit students who are in their church.

The group received reports that a local pastor from New Life Church of Conway was “given access to students at Carl Stuart Middle School during school hours,” according to the letter.

“It is inappropriate and unconstitutional for Conway Public Schools to offer Christian ministers unique access to befriend and proselytize students during the school day on school property,” the letter said.

“This practice is especially concerning if it occurs on a regular basis. No outside adults should be provided carte blanche access to minors — a captive audience — in a public school. This predatory conduct is inappropriate and should raise many red flags.”

Carl Stuart Principal Harvey Benton referred questions to Murry.

The foundation has seen that a pastor will use the school to befriend students with the goal of spreading a gospel message and recruiting young church members, said foundation attorney Patrick Elliott, who wrote the letter.

In the letter, Elliott thanks the school for bringing resolution to another complaint against the district last year.

Elliott said the letter isn’t threatening. His group is informing the district it is in violation of the constitution and asks officials how they’re going to resolve it, he said. As long as it is going on, allowing ministers to visit students during lunch remains a liability for the school district, he said.

“We try to get things resolved informally the best we can and work with school officials on it,” Elliott said. “That’s not always the case. We have at least three lawsuits against schools now. Two are about the ten commandments, and one is about prayer at graduations.”

VISITING OR RECRUITING?

Standridge said his group was informed by letter several weeks ago that the lunchtime visits are suspended until the district reviewed its policy on the matter.

Murry said the school wants to make sure the practice is legal. The move to disallow visits from ministers at lunchtime is temporary, but the time to study the issue could take months, he said.

“We certainly want the community to know that we are wanting to make sure that whatever activities that are allowed at the school are legal for us to do and that’s really what all this is about,” Murry said. “We’re not trying to kick anybody out of the school, or an organization out of the school. Whatever we do, we have to make sure we are on the correct side of the law.”

According to Standridge, the meeting Thursday was to update and inform the group, but not to tell them they were allowed back on campuses.

K-Life director Anderson Wilkins said the school is not done crafting a policy that is “in the best interest of the students and families, and within the legal constraints that a public school is up against.”

Standridge said the group was told the school is seeking outside legal counsel to aid in the policy’s construction.

Wilkins said Conway K-Life has a long history of visiting Conway students at lunchtime. He said K-Life ministers will talk to other students about the ministry when asked, but said “The purpose is to maintain relationships with our students invested in our ministry and to go and be a positive influence during the school day.”

“To be clear, the purpose of these visits is not to recruit students to K-Life,” Standridge added. “My understanding (of) the purpose is to visit existing kids in the programs. The purpose is not to recruit kids into the programs.”

WHERE TO 'DRAW THE LINE' 

Conway school district may be within its legal boundaries of separation of church and state, said board member Bill Clements.

“They are just supporting kids who go to their church,” Clements said. “They are not trying to recruit other kids.”

Under current school visitation policy, friends and family can come visit children at lunch. Grandparents often come for visits. Even Clements visited children during lunch while he was part of a group of dads who volunteer at elementary schools, he said.

“Where do you draw the line on who can visit kids at lunch?” Clements asked.

The school already mandates visitors passes and has a procedure in place for when and whom to allow lunchtime visits, Clements said.

The ministers all had parental consent to visit the schoolchildren, Murry said. No parent has complained about the visits either, he said.

Clements said he supports youth ministers visiting children who are already in their churches.

“I don’t have a problem with a friend coming in and visiting with friends or members of their church, but I wouldn’t want them coming in and preaching,” Clements said.

Freedom From Religion is overreacting, Clements said. The visits are not like a “revival” where people preach and recruit, he said. These are visits, he said.

“I get a little frustrated sometimes with organizations that believe we are allowing our kids to be brainwashed — that’s not the case,” Clements said.

The school will do whatever is “legally correct,” Murry said.

Based on a study the school is undertaking, Murry will make a recommendation to the school board, he said. No decision on any new policy was made at the meeting Thursday, he said.

“We’re going to do our homework. We’re going to study it very carefully,” Murry said.

Clements said the group complaining about the visits is trying to “browbeat” the school district. The foundation has complained in the past, he said. About two years ago, the school district stopped allowing The Gideons International, a group associated with Bible distribution, to pass out Bibles before school after an organization complained, Clements said.

In the letter, Elliott wrote: “We appreciate that you resolved a complaint regarding bible distribution in another Conway school last year. We ask for your prompt attention to this related concern.”

Clements said the group wants to take Bibles out of schools completely.

Murry said the decision not to allow the distribution of Bibles was based on legal advice.

With this issue, Clements said he feels comfortable with supporting youth ministers visiting schoolchildren. If the community feels strongly enough, and the school district is not breaking any law, he said he could see school officials allowing the issue to go to court.

Murry said he couldn’t speak to a possible lawsuit.

###

 

To view the letter, copy and paste this link: 

http://con-cdn.com/sites/default/files/Conway Public Schools AR-Pastor at lunch.pdf

Or view the jpgs of the letter.

  • Comment

Comments (84)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
sevenof400
6793
Points
sevenof400 01/17/13 - 07:45 pm
7
16

-This- is exactly why this meeting should have been public....

..so the idiots from Freedom From Religion could answer for their stupidity.

BTW the letter link is broken...

ifyoudontknownowyouknow
371
Points
ifyoudontknownowyouknow 01/17/13 - 07:45 pm
8
24

Soo sad

And we as a nation wonder why there is so much violence in schools. The problem is taking CHRIST out not the other way around. Men and women of faith need to stand together.

ARVoiceofLogic
4994
Points
ARVoiceofLogic 01/18/13 - 09:48 am
14
4

Clarify please

I thought god was omnipotent and everywhere at all times. He is with us always. Do you honestly believe that a federal law that says public teachers can't lead/force students into a specific prayer means that God is like "oopsie better not cross this line"? So you believe in a weak god?

Please. You either believe in God or you think God is obedient to humans. I get so sick of facebook statuses along the lines of "I allow school shootings because I'm not allowed in schools. - God" There is so much wrong with that it disgusts me.

You say men and women of faith need to stand together. Which faith?

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 01/18/13 - 11:30 am
3
6

interesting article....

Unpublished

http://alivewithchrist.com/connecticutschoolshooting/

an admittedly-long excerpt

"“If there really is a God, then why do bad things happen to good people?”

1. If God can prevent evil, but won’t, then He’s not a very good God
2. If God wants to prevent evil but can’t, then He’s not all-powerful

When approaching this difficult topic, there’s one principle that we must remember. God, by His very nature, is the definition of true love. “The one who does not love does not know God, for God is love” (1 John 4:8.) In fact, God loves man so much, that He created us with free will (cf. Joshua 24:15; Isaiah 7:15; Genesis 2:16-17). When real love exists, it must involve freedom of choice by both parties. Have you ever said, “If you love someone, you have to let them go”? Well, that’s biblical. Consider how relationships work. Most men are physically stronger than women. Because of this, most men can force a woman to have sex with them if they choose to. This is rape: the act of forcing your own will upon another without their consent. Everyone agrees there is no “love” in this type relationship, because the woman did not consent for the man to do what he wanted. However, “rape” doesn’t just refer to sexual activity. Some people try to force others to do comply regardless their choice. Relationships based on force contain no love.

Well, the same is true with God, who “is love.” God wants what’s best for us. However most people don’t want to do what God tells them to, even though if they just obeyed they’d spend eternity in heaven with Him. Now, if God forced each of us to do His will (like it or not), this would make God sort of a “spiritual rapist.” God, by His very nature, cannot and will not force us to do anything. If He did, then God wouldn’t truly love us. God must allow us to freely choose to do what He says (or to reject His will) for Him to be truly a loving God. "

Scarlet Sims
1976
Points
Scarlet Sims 01/17/13 - 07:56 pm
5
0

The letter

To see the letter, visit: http://con-cdn.com/sites/default/files/Conway Public Schools AR-Pastor at lunch.pdf

You have to copy and paste it to your browser. We'll try to get that fixed, but for now, just copy paste.

Thanks!

reader
16453
Points
reader 01/17/13 - 10:42 pm
7
3

Pretty good title there Scarlet

I've met quite a few pastors who were "out to lunch" and it would have fit better under the circumstances.

General Disarray
7473
Points
General Disarray 01/17/13 - 08:05 pm
3
4

hmm

I wonder if notthisboy still thinks it's not news.

havok
222
Points
havok 01/17/13 - 08:06 pm
6
19

Democrats have no problem

Democrats have no problem with Religion in schools...As Long as it isn't Christianity.

Igor Rabinowitz
7584
Points
Igor Rabinowitz 01/17/13 - 08:10 pm
17
2

Levels of stuff

The Freedom From org would not even exist, were it not for those who've taken such freedoms and turned it into a, what, recruitment scheme, tent revival?

Knowing the parties involved here, obviously this wasn't the case, but Freedom From is there due to worst-case actors.

And of course, always exists the argument of the kid uncomfortable in such settings but feeling compelled to act accepting due to social pressure.

The flip side being the kids are losing real-world access to role models who don't spit or cuss (unlike, for example, this correspondent), which in today's world matters more than ever.

I'd like to think some middle-ground resolution is out there, but I'm skeptical. I doubt, for example, the "no harm" tone would exist, or at least be expressed as forthrightly, were the visitor a Muslim cleric, or Hindu, or whatever. In such an environment of playing favorites, what choice is there but to close that door?

Pity.

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 01/17/13 - 10:50 pm
9
11

uh yeah

Unpublished

The peer pressure to become a Christian is tremendous in middle through high school.

Yawn.

Back to Top