• Syndicate content
  • Comment

Commission denies new ‘indoor playground’

Posted: December 18, 2012 - 10:45am
A conceptual drawing of a portion of The Clubhouse, a proposed indoor playground, which was denied by the Conway Planning Commission Monday night. SUBMITTED ART
A conceptual drawing of a portion of The Clubhouse, a proposed indoor playground, which was denied by the Conway Planning Commission Monday night. SUBMITTED ART

A new indoor playground was rejected by the Conway Planning Commission while an older outdoor one by the same owners was given its stamp of approval during the commission’s final scheduled meeting of 2012.

The Clubhouse, a proposed indoor play area that needed a planned unit development amendment to set up shop in the Scherman Heights PUD at 575 Club Lane, was met with fierce resistance from two homeowners groups, the Windcrest Subdivision Homeowners and the Scherman Heights Homeowners. Their pleas to deny the request coupled with the commission’s own investigations persuaded the denial, which was 7-2. Mark Lewis and Anne Tucker voted against the denial.

Citing traffic and noise concerns, several residents of the two subdivisions voiced opposition to the proposed commercial recreational facility, which would have been started by the owners of Pediatrics Plus, a center for developmentally disabled children. The location of The Clubhouse would have been next to Pediatrics Plus on Lot 7D.

Ken Holder, who represented both groups of homeowners, said rezoning for the new facility would cause a “decline in the value of our homes. This is not appropriate use of the facility. This facility does not represent what it was originally built as.”

The Scherman Heights PUD is zoned mainly as quiet office, and commissioner Chris Steplock pointed out that while he thought the original idea of The Clubhouse was a “no brainer,” he voted to deny the request because of the possible location of the center.

“If we were rezoning this place from scratch, I think we wouldn’t consider anything other than quiet office, especially when considering the proximity to houses in the neighborhood,” Steplock said. “I think we need to be sympathetic to the neighbors in the area.”

The Clubhouse is proposed to be an indoor commercial recreational facility serving young children. Those bring the request said the place would be different in allowing children and parents to interact in a miniature city. No electronic games would be allowed, and no internal or external sound systems would be used.

Property owners of the Windcrest Subdivision also requested a PUD review of Pediatrics Plus, which was originally established in 2003. The main concern is an outdoor playground that bumps up directly to the back yard of neighbors in the Windcrest Subdivision.

The commission voted 6-3 to deny the review, although Jeff Allender, who voted against the motion to deny, pointed out that “in the 10 years that we have been granting PUDs, we have never had a review. I would think that we might want to at least check in from time to time to make sure the rules are being maintained.” Kimberly Gardner and Matthew Brown also voted against the motion to deny.

Those who chose to deny the request said they did so based on the information provided by Bryan Patrick of the Planning Department, who said that an outdoor playground is required as child care in an O-2 zoning. He also said other concerns such as green space and land use were being kept in compliance.

Holder asked the commission for the review, once again citing property values. He brought a petition signed by 144 residents, and he asked for the commission to consider what he believed to be other violations.

The commission also elected its officers for 2013. Jon Arms will serve as chairman with Jeff Allender as vice chairman and Lee Washington as secretary.

  • Comment

Comments (10)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
BuzzBy
17777
Points
BuzzBy 12/18/12 - 10:58 am
5
1

Property Values

Unpublished

Did you say property values the planning commission has never considered anything like that but if you know someone or knows someone who knows someone then you can get things passed right on through.

But no worry if at 1st you can't get past the commission just bring it before the city conucil and get someone who knows someone that has Tab and crews ears and poof your up and running in no time at all.

Seen it time after time regardless of what the neighbors think or their property values.

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 12/18/12 - 11:02 am
5
0

once again

Unpublished

Society shows how much it values disabled kids.

turdferguson
310
Points
turdferguson 12/18/12 - 11:06 am
6
0

Brilliant logic. Inside

Brilliant logic. Inside playground is too noisy. Outside playground full of screaming kids is just fine.

Tova
258
Points
Tova 12/18/12 - 11:36 am
4
0

DITTO

Agree with the first 3 comments!

BuzzBy
17777
Points
BuzzBy 12/18/12 - 11:47 am
5
1

WOOOO HOOOOOO

Unpublished

Someone agrees with me boy are they misguided!!!

DJB1971
15049
Points
DJB1971 12/18/12 - 11:49 am
3
0

Someone agrees with BuzzBy...

...yet another sign that they Mayans were correct. :-(

Tova
258
Points
Tova 12/18/12 - 11:36 am
3
0

DITTO

Agree with the first 3 comments!

BuzzBy
17777
Points
BuzzBy 12/18/12 - 11:48 am
2
1

WOOOOO HOOOOOOO

Unpublished

Someone agrees with me boy are they misguided!!!

ArkyBass
746
Points
ArkyBass 12/18/12 - 01:21 pm
4
0

A Bank

Need a bank there. No good reason to have a playground facility near where children live or where children might go for some sort of treatment. I sure wouldn't want to own property near such a potential for crime, not to mention the thugs that would be hanging about. I would want McDonalds and several other restaraunts that serve alchol and a bank as close a possible to my home.

rzrbakfan
145
Points
rzrbakfan 12/18/12 - 02:13 pm
2
0

Just to note...

I did not see where it said the facility would be for disabled children. Just that it would be started by the owners of Pediatrics Plus which cares for disabled children.

Back to Top