An 89-year-old woman who suffered severe burns during a house fire at 928 Center St. mid-morning Tuesday died of her injuries, Conway fire chief Bart Castleberry said.
“It’s a tragedy,” Castleberry said.
Dorthea Thompson was air lifted from a nearby church parking lot on Prince Street to the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences at about noon Tuesday. At that time, Castleberry described her condition as “critical.”
A candle in a bedroom started the fire.
Flames were not visible from the street, but smoke billowed from the roof of the home. Concerned friends and neighbors gathered in nearby yards. The Conway Police Department blocked off streets to assist firefighters.
Thompson’s great-grandson, Zachary Mullican, about 20, was upstairs when he heard the smoke alarm. He went downstairs and discovered smoke and fire, Castleberry said. He looked for Thompson and found her already burned and in a bathtub.
“Her (great) grandson scooped her up and got her out,” Castleberry said.
Castleberry said Thompson was burned before she got into the bathtub. He described her as “lucid” before Baptist Health MedFlight flew her to the hospital.
“She was a very, strong little lady,” Castleberry said.
Firefighters contained the fire to two rooms, including the bedroom, Castleberry said. Both rooms were “heavily damaged” and the rest of the home had smoke damage, he said.
Castleberry said the investigation into the fire is closed. Conway Police Department spokeswoman La Tresha Woodruff said earlier the police department doesn’t plan an investigation and referred questions to the fire department.
Thompson’s death is the second fire fatality in 2012, Castleberry said. In March, Tom Southerland died of injuries from a house fire near Blaney Hill Road.
### (Above is final version)
Update from Tuesday:
The woman who was severely burned in a house fire today died of her injuries, Conway fire chief Bart Castleberry said.
"It's a tragedy," Castleberry said.
The fire was started by a lighted candle in the bedroom. Two rooms, including the bedroom, were heavily damaged in the fire. The rest of the house had smoke damage, Castleberry said.
###
(noon) An 89-year-old woman suffered severe burns during a house fire at 928 Center St. mid-morning today, Conway fire chief Bart Castleberry said.
Dorthea Thompson was air lifted from a nearby church parking lot on Prince Street to the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences at about noon. Castleberry described her condition as "critical."
Although initial information indicated the woman's gown caught fire, Castleberry said that is not the case. According to preliminary information, the woman's adult-age great grandson was upstairs when he heard the smoke alarm. He went downstairs and discovered smoke and fire, Castleberry said. He looked for Thompson and found her already burned and in a bathtub.
"Her (great) grandson scooped her up and got her out," Castleberry said.
Firefighters contained the fire to two rooms, including a bedroom, Castleberry said.
An investigation into what caused the fire, where it started and exactly how the woman was burned is ongoing.
###
(Posted around noon)
Conway firefighters respond to a call about a house fire on Center Street mid-morning Tuesday.
The fire appears to have been small, with little to no smoke visible, in the house, but according to scanner traffic, a woman's gown caught fire.
The elderly woman was conscious and said the fire was an accident, said La Tresha Woodruff, spokeswoman for the Conway Police Department. The woman is being air lifted out of the First United Methodist Church parking lot on Prince Street.
Check back for a full story.

Comments (22)
Add commentConfusion....
I read this story twice and the once out loud to a co-worker and am more confused now than I was after just reading it once. Why was she airlifted to a church instead of a hospital? Where on center street did the copter land?
I really hope this lady is OK and glad she got out....
Shorter version: Fire was at
Shorter version:
Fire was at an elderly woman's home. The home is located on Center Street.
Officials used the parking lot at the church to air lift the woman out and to UAMS.
Confusion....
I read this story twice and then once out loud to a co-worker and am more confused now than I was after just reading it once. Why was she airlifted to a church instead of a hospital? Where on center street did the copter land?
I really hope this lady is OK and glad she got out....
RIF
"The woman is being air lifted out of the First United Methodist Church on Prince Street."
The copter landed in the church parking lot.
I don't want to know where you work if you and a co-worker can't piece that mystery together.
Well seeing as how your
Well seeing as how your quoted wording is different than what is currently in the article (it includes the words 'parking lot') I'm guessing the reporters changed the wording after the first comment and before you saw it. If that is the case, just another example of sloppy reporting.
During the editing process,
During the editing process, which is done online now so that readers have instant access to developing information, an editor added the words "parking lot." I am glad these words made the sentence clearer, but that does not constitute "sloppy reporting."
Thanks for reading the LCD.
I disagree.
Apparently the editing was done after publishing, which is the opposite of proper reporting, therefore it was sloppy. For an article this length it takes a whole 20 seconds to read over to make sure everything is worded properly, and since I highly doubt there were people banging on your door to get this story out it was 20 seconds that should have been taken before you hit 'save'.
Try again.
And go ahead, keep giving me thumbs down. Just shows me that people don't care about quality reporting anymore.
well
I understood the first version. May I recommend...
I'll have to pass on that
I'll have to pass on that since my argument isn't that I misunderstood the article. My argument is that the LCD has far too often written an article, posted it on the website, then decided it was a good idea to edit it after publishing, most often without noting a disclaimer that what we see hours later is not what was originally published. If they are going to be sloppy, then fine. They should take some responsibility for their work and note that they were wrong the first time if they felt the need to change anything.
well
One day we'll have robotic reporters and then you will have to find another outlet to complain.