• Comment

State waives death penalty for man accused of murder

Posted: November 10, 2012 - 2:38pm
Back | Next
Clayton Monsees  FCSO
FCSO
Clayton Monsees

The state has waived the death penalty in the case against a man accused in the March 20 murder of Billy Joe Ewing.

Clayton Monsees, 31, was charged with capital murder following the shooting and stabbing death of Ewing at his home.

Prosecutors also charged Ewing’s wife and Monsees’ ex-wife, Amanda Leigh Ewing, 27, as an accomplice in his murder.

Monsees appeared in Faulkner County Circuit court on Tuesday, where his case was transferred from Judge David Reynolds’ 1st Division court to 2nd Division court under Judge Michael Maggio following the continuance of the case.

“There are aggravators and mitigators  under current law that have to be evaluated before going forward with the death penalty in any case,” said Prosecutor Cody Hiland. “However, when there are multiple defendants involved in the same case there are obviously other factors that must be taken into account that we wouldn’t be at liberty to discuss until later in process.”

Reports indicate that Ewing, 27, arrived at the residence on Laramie Road shortly before midnight March 20 and confronted Monsees in his home.

Monsees was allegedly involved in an altercation with Ewing and officials believe he shot Ewing once in the throat and then stabbed him in the shoulder. Ewing was able to make it across the yard to his mother’s home, where he reportedly gave a statement to his mother implicating his attacker.

He was transported by ambulance to Conway Regional Medical Center, where he later succumbed to his injuries.

Monsees was apprehended by authorities the following day, after being on the run for several hours.

Amanda Ewing was arrested on April 4.

In a July forensic evaluation by Counseling Associates, Monsees told interviewers that he met Amanda Ewing through the Internet around 2002 and eventually married her.

Monsees said he had been in Arkansas less than 24 hours when the incident occurred, having left from Wisconsin on a Greyhound bus before catching a ride to Greenbrier. When asked why he traveled to Arkansas, Monsees reportedly responded, “To start over, get a place, get a job, something better.”

According to the report, Monsees acknowledged his complicity in the incident, but consistently denied any planning or premeditation, telling the interviewer that he hoped to have the charge reduced to first-degree murder. “But if (the charge isn’t reduced) I would be willing to take life,” he said.

When asked directly whether he shot or stabbed Ewing, he reportedly replied, “Yes.”

He disputed the role of Amanda Ewing in the incident as relayed in the police reports, but denied comment on his version of events on the night in question.

In the report, Monsees also disclosed to interviewers a history of sexual abuse by his biological mother between the ages of 1 and 5, and two prior convictions — one for attempted robbery in 2003 and another for a burglary charge in Tennesssee — “Somewhere,” he said. “I don’t even remember it.” Monsees added that he tried to join the Army but went AWOL before boot camp.

The capital murder charges carry two enhancements; one because a .22 caliber firearm was used in the commission of the crime and the other because the crime was committed in the presence of three minor children, two of which belonged to the victim.

Both Monsees and Ewing have pleaded not guilty to the Class Y felony and are being held in Faulkner County jail on $500,000 cash bond.

A pretrial hearing for Monsees has been set for 9 a.m. Jan. 7, 2013. Amanda Ewing will appear in court for a pretrial hearing at 9 a.m. Dec. 6 in Division 1 with Judge Reynolds presiding.

(Megan Reynolds is a staff writer and can be reached by e-mail at megan.reynolds@thecabin.net or by phone at 505-1277. Follow us on Twitter @lcdonline.)

  • Comment
Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
GodsPrincess
39
Points
GodsPrincess 11/10/12 - 08:21 pm
8
1
Why?

Why off the table? Because BJ wasn't rich or important enough! He was important to us and his life mattered to his family and especially to his children who were present when these two decided to take his life! So this man gets the option to live his life in prison when BJ lays in the ground dead never to see his children grow ...this is wrong on so many levels...Amanda gets to see her children grow up maybe from a prison cell but yet she still gets to see them and BJ never gets that option...Why can't justice be sought for all and not just the rich and important?

maryelizabeth
9
Points
maryelizabeth 11/10/12 - 09:36 pm
5
1
Not fair!!

It's not fair at all that BJ's children will never get to see him again. They should have gotten the death penalty, Not sit in prison and have tax payers feed them, and they damn sure don't need to have a plea bargain, BJ didn't get to plead for his life, he was murdered in cold blood In front of his children who will have to live with this the rest of their lives. .. They deserve better. BJ deserves better, his life meant something. For God sake they laid in wait for him to get home from work, and gunned him down in cold blood, and then stabbed him! Someone please tell me why his family has to suffer, while the state wants to let them get by with a slap on the hand. I believe the Bible: an eye for eye.

D. Boon
77
Points
D. Boon 11/12/12 - 10:57 am
7
1
What happened to "full force of the law," Mr. Prosecutor?

Election season is over, I guess. Big talk, Mr. Hiland.

Back to Top