• Syndicate content
  • Comment

Rezoning for townhouses denied for second time

Posted: October 16, 2012 - 6:56pm

Following a wave of opposition by neighborhood residents, the Conway Planning Commission denied a rezoning request by Mike Grimes, the second denial in more than a year for the property located on Hubbard Road near two schools.

Grimes and developer Chris Thornton had wanted to rezone a 4-acre area from residential (R-1) to planned unit development (PUD) in order to place 67 townhouse units within a gated community across the street from Carl Stuart Middle School and Marguerite Vann Elementary School. The commission voted 9-0 to deny the request.

Opposition to the request came from a petition signed by residents in nearby neighborhoods and parents of students of the two schools as well as more than 10 residents speaking out against the request and another 60 in attendance at the meeting.

Commission member Jeff Allender expressed his problem with the development before voting to deny the request.

“I certainly empathize with the property owner,” Allender said. “But there just seem to be too many problems placing this many units into this type of space. The main problem here is that the schools are placed there and may be in the wrong place, but they do not have to have permission from us where to build. It’s like two hands not talking to each other.”

This is the second time a rezoning request has been denied by the commission for the property. Previously, the developer had requested a zoning of multi-family housing (MF-2) and had been told by the Conway City Council to be more specific about their plans and ask for a PUD, which could allow for certain restrictions by the commission or the council. Commissioner Lee Washington said he did not see any difference between the previous request and the current one except for a picture of what the property would look like.

Thornton said he had received favorable input from the council before and had scaled back the original concept from 71 to 67 units.

Grimes said despite three public meetings within the neighborhood, he has seen an organized campaign against him.

“Something will be developed there,” Grimes said. “And I am trying to make that area the best it can be. Those could end up as starter homes that wind up as rental houses ... or government subsidized houses.”

Without the townhouses, there remains a possibility of 16 smaller houses being built in the area.

A stream of residents stood up to speak out against this development, citing safety concerns, traffic and the possibility that the units could house more students from the University of Central Arkansas. More than one resident spoke up that having more college students could be a problem, especially with many children walking from their houses to their schools.

“I’d hate to be a college student in Conway after what I heard tonight,” said Commission member Chris Steplock. “I thought there was some unnecessary stereotyping going on from some of the comments.”

In other business, two earlier proposals were not heard by the commission. A request for a conditional use permit for plant storage was withdrawn and the request for a conditional use permit for a pharmacy drive-thru was held in committee after the party making the request was not able to attend.

Two preliminary subdivisions were approved, the Overland Heights PUD at Collins Drive and the Weatherstone Phase II near Marble Drive and Newcastle Drive.

  • Comment

Comments (20)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
BuzzBy
17777
Points
BuzzBy 10/17/12 - 08:03 am
9
0

What

Unpublished

Mike Grimes and developer Chris Thornton need to do is get Hal Krafton to run this thur the council since he may get turned down by the planning commission but as far as I know he HAS NEVER been turn down by the city council NEVER.

IDKM
4175
Points
IDKM 10/17/12 - 10:37 am
6
1

Good news for now

"Grimes said despite three public meetings within the neighborhood, he has seen an organized campaign against him."

That's right, the community has spoken. It is an R1 so leave it an R1.

This is not a good location for 67 townhouses. What a nightmare. Two schools right beside each other generates a lot of traffic. They already have to line up on both sides of the street just to make it feasible.

MessiahAndrw
1078
Points
MessiahAndrw 10/17/12 - 11:10 am
5
3

Maybe, but it would also make

Maybe, but it would also make for attractive homes for potentially 67 families that want to live within walking distance from a school.

Granted thought, your typical townhouse occupant tends to be college students and childless couples, but the opportunity is still there.

But still, the schools came before the townhouses, so you would assume that any potential occupants would be well aware of the traffic consequences of living next to two schools.

IDKM
4175
Points
IDKM 10/17/12 - 12:50 pm
6
0

That's just it

They want to build with college students in mind instead of single family homes.

It will no doubt generate more traffic to the area but how much will be determined by homes versus townhomes.

ucantbserious
25486
Points
ucantbserious 10/17/12 - 01:54 pm
5
1

Hmm

Well how many college students take 8am classes?

IDKM
4175
Points
IDKM 10/17/12 - 02:04 pm
6
0

hmm

Don't have a clue - nor from the hours of 2:15 to 3:45 when it is also conjested.

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 10/17/12 - 11:11 am
7
2

psst

Unpublished

hey....
Mr Grimes....
just a tip...

RED BRICK.

You didn't hear it from me, though.

DJB1971
15047
Points
DJB1971 10/17/12 - 11:40 am
5
2

And...

...Aramark may be willing to pay for the installation of the required sidewalks. ;-)

wisea55
372
Points
wisea55 10/17/12 - 12:25 pm
3
5

The town of colleges

The town of colleges discriminates against College students. Great headline.

jdraper
2302
Points
jdraper 10/17/12 - 11:33 pm
4
3

If only the students cared.

I dunno, I'm having a huge problem with UCA students at the place where I work. They can't smoke on campus anymore, so they come across the street and gather in large groups at commercial properties. And it wouldn't be such a big deal, except they leave trash all over the place, and scare off customers with their snide comments, and they're dumb enough to smoke/sell drugs on the property. The UCA PD won't do anything, because it's outside their jurisdiction (literally across the street, while they're quite happy to sit in our parking lot to go after speeders), and Conway PD won't do anything unless we spend money to put up "NO LOITERING" signs. I'm fed up. But what are we to do?

Back to Top