A pre-teen girl was sexually assaulted by an adult she knew, but prosecutors said her comments and the behavior that followed the assault were ignored until she wrote something at school that concerned a teacher.
After the case was investigated and charges were filed, the victim told a mental health professional that she was not scared of the offender and wished that he would be allowed to return to his home. As a result of that request and recommendations from a caseworker with the Department of Human Services, the man walked out of the courtroom and back to his life.
Christopher Scott Barr, 33, of Vilonia stood before Judge David Reynolds last month after pleading guilty to sexual assault in the second degree and received 60 months of probation. A $2,500 fine was suspended as long as he completes sex offender treatment and abides by all of the orders from the court and the rules given to him by a DHS caseworker. He has been allowed contact with the victim.
The Central Arkansas Children’s Advocacy Center, a group that helps children who have been victims of crime navigate through the justice system, was not involved in this specific case. Tess Fletcher, director of the center, said her agency generally would not recommend that a sexual abuse victim be placed into a situation where he or she would see the abuser on a regular basis.
“What the Children’s Advocacy Alliance works hard to do is create an environment where the child feels safe,” she said. “Although it is looked upon on a case by case basis, we are most frequently dealing with children who have recently suffered trauma and are not in a position where contact with the offender in any way is in the best interest of the child.”
Fletcher went on to say that her agency would only recommend contact if a mental health professional believed contact would aid in the child’s healing process.
While Fletcher’s agency deals with victims throughout the duration of the court proceedings, caseworkers with the Department of Human Services have contact with victims even after their court cases are over. However, their recommendations may be a determining factor in what sentences the offenders receive.
According to Amy Webb, DHS director of communications, the main goal of the agency in any case is to make sure the child is safe.
“Our No. 1 priority is the safety of the child,” she said. “If we feel a child is not safe, we will remove the child from his/her current environment. A lot of factors are reviewed to determine safety. Each case is looked at individually as there is no one formula that fits every situation — even situations that may seem clear-cut. In general, when DHS gets involved, the child may receive counseling and therapy as well as other services.”
Still speaking in general terms, Webb went on to say that when a judge is deciding whether to keep a child in close proximity to the person who was being investigated or to keep the child in foster care, the judge may take into consideration information from DHS caseworkers, recommendations of therapists and what the child wants to happen.
During Barr’s sentencing, his attorney, Frank Shaw, requested probation because “it was the right thing to do.” Shaw stated that he believes prosecutors are being too hard on sex offenders. The following excerpt was taken from a transcribed record of the court proceedings.
“Apparently the State presumes that no good can ever come out of a bad situation and I disagree with that not only here but as a general theory,” Shaw said. “If the State is going to be hard on sex offenders and homicide, well, that’s great, but you need to look at each case on an individual basis and not paint everyone with the same broad brush and that seems to be the situation of the State at this particular time. Sex offense, you go to prison, in spite of the counselor’s recommendation, in spite of the victim’s pleas and those of the mother. In spite of the counseling and anger management, in spite of the fact that DHS is recommending” a return to regular contact.
(Candie Beck is a staff writer and can be reached at 505-1238 or at candie.beck@thecabin.net)

Comments (45)
Add commentWords fail
Words fail...
Well...
At least we see Frank Shaw's true colors.
This story makes me want to cry. The girl--AND HER MOTHER?!!--request the offender be allowed to return home. This is a pre-teen child who thinks she's old enough to handle sexual assault--she may even think it's consensual. The mother has no protective instinct toward her daughter. Many of my friends in school had mothers like this.
About 15 years ago, I read a chilling book called Kinsey:Crimes & Consequences that dealt with the rise of child sex abuse in America. I wondered if there was a video version so I did a search on youtube. I did not watch all the documentary, but the first segment was pretty telling if anybody is interested. Here's the link...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZiSjR6rE7I&feature=related
the child, the victim
has been sacrificed by the system that I thought was charged with defending her and for providing a safe haven free of abuse and exploitation. "During Barr’s sentencing, his attorney, Frank Shaw, requested probation because “it was the right thing to do.” Shaw stated that he believes prosecutors are being too hard on sex offenders. Too Hard? Impossible, even a convicted sex offender says he/she will offend again and again. A child craves a home and people to care of them - security. In this case a sexual predator is involved. Nothing makes sense if the Child Protective Services goal is to protect a minor from abuse. It will happen again and she/he will deal with it until becomes a highy explosive situation that might end a victim's chance at a nornal life.
Why did this case not go through CASA?
this is sad
It makes me wonder if he will have to regeister as a sex offender? In my opion he should be in jail. What he did was wrong and just getting probation is not enough. He should not be around kids at all. But with the type of work he does he is around them a lot.
Words fail
Castration doesn't.
Unbelievable!
On so many levels.
you don't know the whole story
We don't know what went on, So we should not judge by what the media wants us to know. We don't know what really went on in this case, but I am glad that someone is listening to the Victim, There are so many times the counts do not. I like the part where it says -
"you need to look at each case on an individual basis and not paint everyone with the same broad brush and that seems to be the situation of the State at this particular time" I have a love on who is in prison for just looking at pictures. Sex Offender have the highest rate of NOT re-offending.
Wow. Words fail to describe
Wow. Words fail to describe this
This is shocking!
What's the story behind the story? This doesn't make sense. There has to be more to this than meets the eye.
Sex offender gets probation
I'm thinking that Mr. Shaw knows more about the situation than we do. What is sexual assault in the second degree? Does that mean he didn't penetrate her? Should a person go to prison for several years for touching a child in forbidden places, or should they get probation and a lot of counseling? I think if I was the mother I would not want my child to ever be alone with him again.