• Comment

Ark. Sen. Pryor: Questions remain on Syria vote

Posted: September 2, 2013 - 6:34pm
Back | Next
In this photo taken  Aug. 2, 2013, U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark., is interviewed in Little Rock, Ark. Pryor is being challenged in the 2014 senate race by Republican U.S. Rep. Tom Cotton. (AP Photo/Danny Johnston)  AP
AP
In this photo taken Aug. 2, 2013, U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark., is interviewed in Little Rock, Ark. Pryor is being challenged in the 2014 senate race by Republican U.S. Rep. Tom Cotton. (AP Photo/Danny Johnston)

TEXARKANA, Ark. — U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor of Arkansas said Monday that President Barack Obama needs to explain what America’s interest would be in attacking Syria, while Republican rival and U.S. Rep. Tom Cotton said he’s worried the presidency would be weakened if Obama’s request is voted down.

The two rivals and other members of the state’s congressional delegation were split on whether to back a military strike against the Syrian government, which U.S. officials say used sarin gas to kill at least 1,429 civilians, more than 400 of whom were children. Obama announced Saturday that he would seek congressional approval for action against Syria when lawmakers return to Washington next week.

Pryor said he has questions that must be answered as weighs the vote, including what interests would be served and the goals of any military action. Pryor, a Democrat, said he believed a draft of Obama’s request for military action is too broad. The draft resolution asks Congress to authorize force to “deter, disrupt, prevent and degrade” the ability of Syrian President Assad’s regime to use chemical weapons. It doesn’t lay out a timeline for action.

“I’m really waiting on him to articulate the American interest and what goals or what end-state he would like to achieve,” Pryor said as he campaigned at a steelworkers picnic in Texarkana on Monday.

Pryor said he also wanted to see the president build a broad-based international coalition and explain how he would measure success.

“I don’t want to get into another situation like we’ve seen before where we get into one of these things and it’s hard to measure if we’re being successful or not,” Pryor said. “I think the president needs to be very clear on that on the front end and I’m not satisfied in that area yet.”

Cotton, a first-term congressman who is challenging Pryor next year, said he supports the U.S. taking action against Syria and planned to be involved in drafting the resolution that the House will vote on later this month. Cotton, an Army veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, said he believed it was in the United States’ interest to take action against Syria after its use of chemical weapons.

“What I hope to do is encourage not just my colleagues to support action but also encourage the president to take effective and decisive action,” Cotton said.

Cotton said he was worried what impact voting down the president’s request would have. Cotton said he believed intervening was a national security issue.

Other Republican members of the state’s delegation expressed reservations about the president’s request.

Republican Rep. Tim Griffin said the president faces an uphill battle in convincing him that the U.S. should take action against Syria.

“I am open to listening to whatever presentation or briefing is available, but it’s going to be hard to convince me we should give the president a license to go to war on this issue, particularly in light of how he has handled it so far,” Griffin said.

Republican Sen. John Boozman said he’s pleased Obama is seeking congressional approval before taking action but said he has concerns about what the president hopes to accomplish by intervening.

“If I had to vote today, I would probably vote against it with the knowledge I have now,” Boozman said.

  • Comment
Comments (5) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
reader
18512
Points
reader 09/03/13 - 06:34 am
1
1
Thoughts on Syria

Its really tough to maintain your principles while trying not to fall off the fence, huh, Mark?

I'm suprised Tom 'Forest Gump' Cotton had time from his evangelizing to make a comment. Big surprise he's all for war.

I guess Tim is waiting for a call from Karl Rove before he makes his decision.

Republicans have been begging to get some power in the trilogy of our constitutional republic, now Obama is giving it to them. But he should have called congress back into emergency session to do so.

At this point, why don't we just have the Pentagon fax over to Assad the frickin plans!

This Syrian conflict may turn the fissure in the GOP into the Grand Canyon of political divide.

We are not the only nation with responsibility to step into this dung pile. If the UN doesn't do it, then lets the the F... out of the UN!

Diogenes
9809
Points
Diogenes 09/02/13 - 09:03 pm
1
1
We can't afford a military strike

Certainly not to give aid and trianing to Al Qaeda and the brotherhood, while jeopardizing the lives of 2M Christains. Geez, we can't even afford the first family's vacations. We shouldn't go and do something that we shouldn't do, just because BO said something he shouldn't have.

tucky tucker
136
Points
tucky tucker 09/03/13 - 03:18 am
0
1
syria war ....y???????????????

we are not the world's police department!!!!! syria hates us,,,the rebels hate us!!!! why even go to syria???? obama cant even fix his screwups here, let alone somwhere else!!!! syria is like iraq,,,just another false flag n an illegal invasion!!!!!

tucky tucker
136
Points
tucky tucker 09/03/13 - 03:22 am
0
1
syria

lets say texas wants to bully new york.......would that be ok???? no....new york is none of texas's business!!!!!

Diogenes
9809
Points
Diogenes 09/03/13 - 08:59 am
1
1
So....

1429 defenseless civilians in a country half way around the world, were viciously murdered by their own leader.

"WHAT DOES THAT MATTER NOW?!!!!"

If the attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi, where four Americans lost their lives, never warranted any kind of US retaliation, then this incidence [filtered word] sure doesn't. We shouldn't have any problem putting this tragedy out of our minds as well.
Now I'm not even close to being a perfect Christian, but I'm far better now than I once was. But I must confess that I'm not at all comfortable with someone as secularly minded as Barack Obama, needlessly escalating a military conflict in a relatively close proximity to the plains of Megiddo.

Back to Top