LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Arkansas now has the nation's most restrictive abortion law — a near-ban on the procedure from the 12th week of pregnancy — unless a lawsuit or court action intervenes before it takes effect this summer.
Lawmakers in the Republican-dominated Legislature defied Gov. Mike Beebe, overriding the Democrat's veto. The House voted 56-33 on Wednesday to override Beebe's veto, a day after the Senate voted to do the same.
The votes come less than a week after the Legislature overrode a veto of a separate bill banning most abortions starting in the 20th week of pregnancy. That bill took effect immediately after the final override vote, whereas the 12-week ban won't take effect until this summer.
Abortion rights proponents have said they'll sue to block the 12-week ban from taking effect. Beebe warned lawmakers that both measures would end up wasting taxpayers' money with the state defending them in court, where, he said, they are likely to fail.
The measures' supporters, who expected court challenges, were undaunted.
"Not the governor, nor anyone else other than the courts, can determine if something is constitutional or unconstitutional," Rep. Bruce Westerman, a Republican from Hot Springs, said in urging his colleagues to override Beebe.
Bill sponsor Sen. Jason Rapert, a Republican from Conway, watched the vote from the House gallery and said a number of law firms have offered to help the state defend the laws in court, if it comes to that.
"I'm just grateful that this body has continued to stand up for the bills that have passed. The eyes of the entire nation were on the Arkansas House of Representatives today," he said.
Beebe rejected both measures for the same reasons, saying they are unconstitutional and that they contradict the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion until a fetus could viably survive outside the womb. A fetus is generally considered viable at 22 to 24 weeks.
"The Arkansas Legislature has once again disregarded women's health care and passed the most extreme anti-women's health bill in the country," said Jill June, the CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Heartland. "With this bill, the Arkansas Legislature will force many women to seek unsafe care."
The 12-week ban would prohibit abortions from the point when a fetus' heartbeat can typically be detected using an abdominal ultrasound. It includes exemptions for rape, incest, the life of the mother and highly lethal fetal disorders. The 20-week prohibition, which is based on the disputed claim that a fetus can feel pain by the 20th week and therefore deserves protection from abortion, includes all of the same exemptions except for fetal disorders.
Six Democrats joined with Republicans in voting to override the veto of the 12-week ban. Last week, only two Democrats voted to override the veto of the 20-week ban.
"I think a lot of people felt some pressure after the last vote," said House Minority Leader Greg Leding, a Democrat from Fayetteville.
The measure is among several abortion restrictions lawmakers have backed since Republicans won control of the House and Senate in the November election. Republicans hold 21 of the 35 Senate seats, and 51 of the 100 seats in the House. It takes a simple majority in both chambers to override.
Beebe has signed into law one of those measures, a prohibition on most abortion coverage by insurers participating in the exchange created under the health care law.
Rep. Ann Clemmer, a Republican of Benton serving her third term in the House, asked her colleagues to support the override attempt, saying her votes on anti-abortion bills this year were the first time she could fully express her view on the issue at the Capitol. When Democrats held control, such bills never made it this far.
"If I say that I'm pro-life, at some point I have to do something about what I say I believe," said Clemmer, the bill's sponsor in the House.
Unlike the 20-week ban, which took effect immediately, the 12-week restriction won't take effect until 90 days after the House and Senate adjourn. Lawmakers aren't expected to wrap up this year's session until later this month or April.
In vetoing both measures, Beebe has cited the costs to the state if it has to defend either ban in court. The American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas has vowed to sue if the state enacts the 12-week ban and said it is considering legal action over the 20-week restriction as well.
"I think today, for whatever reason, the Arkansas House turned its back on the women of Arkansas and said, we don't think you're capable of making your own decisions," said Rita Sklar, ACLU of Arkansas' executive director. Sklar said the group planned to file suit in federal court in the next couple weeks.
Beebe noted that the state paid nearly $148,000 to attorneys for plaintiffs who successfully challenged a 1997 late-term abortion ban.
The original version of Rapert's bill would have banned abortions as early as six weeks into a pregnancy, but he changed the measure after facing resistance from some lawmakers worried that it would require the use of a vaginal probe.
Women who have abortions would not face prosecution under Rapert's bill, but doctors who perform abortions in violation of the 12-week ban could have their medical licenses revoked.

Comments (66)
Add commentJudical Review
Coming in 5...4....3....2....
I'll bet a cold beer that this will be over turned by the courts might take as long as Roe vs Wade but it will all turn out to be a HUGE waste of time. IMHO
Of course it will. I'll
Of course it will. I'll match your cold beer with a glass of my favorite Merlot. But - today standing here - I cannot even begin to tell you how I feel as a woman living in Arkansas. I have no words.
MY reproductive health and decisions - up to a certain point - are of NO consequence or business to the state legislature and politicians. They decry government in all its forms. They say that deregulation is the way to go - and yet my basic, protected-by-law right to CHOOSE the best course for my body and my life has just been stolen from me by a clique of MEN who want my uterus to be forced into going through with an unwanted and unintended pregnancy because of THEIR religious beliefs.
What about the women with high blood pressure, who would POTENTIALLY face serious health risks should they carry a pregnancy to full term? Do THEY matter? No......because these MEN see the POTENTIAL for another human being as far greater to fight for than the woman's physical - AND MENTAL - wellbeing. All we are are baby factories - to be kept barefoot and pregnant the majority of our lives after menarche.
Jason Rapert - I am ashamed that you call the same town home that I do. I am shocked that you see the need to waste the state's time and money on BS like this when so many families in Arkansas can't afford to feed the kids they HAVE, let alone reproduce further. Our roads are crumbling, our schools are failing, our waterways are polluted, our downtowns are becoming ghost towns, and you give us - this.
Thanks a bunch. I hope you got a kick out of it at the expense of women.
All the unborn wants...
..is the same rights for their body.
How hard is that to understand?
evidently
Impossible to understand.
I've yet to hear a good explanation on the aborting of a female fetus.
We can all agree that male fetuses should be fed to the wolves, but I don't understand the legality of aborting a female fetus.
An unborn fetus DOES not and
An unborn fetus DOES not and SHOULD not have the same 'rights' as people. And evidently I need to explain to you that a person = a living, breathing, BORN person. Before that, you are a fetus. Welcome to the world of science and rationality. I feel a distinct sensation of deja-vu here.....
Putting the fetuses rights above and before the rights of the mother is just nonsense. I do NOT agree with the abhorrent partial-birth abortions or late-term abortions - I think that if you carry a fetus to a certain point, you have to be very ill and misguided to then suddenly decide to abort it. But a collection of cells in the mother's uterus unable to sustain itself in the outside world (with help from its parents) does NOT constitute a person.
We need a broader discussion of what it means to be pro-life in this country. All this bill does is ensure that the state is pro-birth-at-any-costs. We apparently don't care as much about the already-born.
^Hitting the Nail on the Head
For what it means to be a disingenuous liberal. We need a broader discussion about what privileges are as opposed to so-called rights. Both sides of this argument are disgraceful to the actually goings-on in society. Taxes and inflation should be the arguments at hand, not guns and abortion.
And I will explain to you...
...no one is putting a fetus above a woman.
But they must be on the same terms.
Why should we care less about the unborn?
Because...........you cannot
Because...........you cannot bestow rights and laws and morals on a collection of cells. You can't. It makes no more sense to outlaw abortions at six weeks or twelve weeks than it does to outlaw male masturbation because of all the little 'potential-people-sperm' that are killed in the process. Does each one of them not have the right to not be killed/aborted/ejaculated from the body of a man??? Why - they COULD become a person - derp!
The fetus cannot go out and buy property, cannot feed itself, cannot break laws or adhere to laws. It. Is. Not. A. Person. That is why it is called a 'fetus', and not a 'person'. At least in most people's worlds.
Those who live in an evidence-based society will continue to come down on my side on all this, and those who do not will continue to back pro-life psychobabble like you. It's the way of the world.
"you cannot bestow rights and
"you cannot bestow rights and laws and morals on a collection of cells. You can't."
Aren't we all collections of cells?? I mean, I'm pretty sure every living thing is a collection of cells... We've just evolved.
Ohh who's seen Prometheus?!?!
Um, this just in.....
...you are a collection of cells.