• Syndicate content
  • Comment

USGS: No contamination in water wells near shale operations

Posted: January 12, 2013 - 8:02pm

SPECIAL TO THE LOG CABIN

A study that examined the water quality of 127 shallow domestic wells in the Fayetteville Shale natural gas production area of Arkansas found no groundwater contamination associated with gas production, according to a report released today by the US Geological Survey.

Scientists analyzed water-quality data from samples taken in Van Buren and Faulkner counties in 2011, focusing on chloride concentrations from 127 wells and methane concentrations and carbon isotope ratios from a subsample of 51 wells.

“For more than one hundred years, the USGS has been a source of freely available, unbiased information on our natural resources such as oil, gas, and water, helping government and local leaders make wise decisions for the public good,” said USGS Director Marcia McNutt. “This new study is important in terms of finding no significant effects on groundwater quality from shale gas development within the area of sampling.”

Chloride is a naturally occurring ion that is found at elevated levels in waters associated with gas production. Chloride moves easily through groundwater without reacting with other ions or compounds in solution, making it is a good indicator of whether chemicals used during hydraulic fracturing are reaching groundwater. In this case, the chloride concentrations from this study were not higher than samples taken from nearby areas from 1951 through 1983.

Methane is the primary component of natural gas, but also can be found naturally in shallow shale formations in the Fayetteville Shale area that are used as sources of water for domestic supplies. What methane was found in the water, taken from domestic wells, was either naturally occurring, or could not be attributed to natural gas production activities.

“None of the data that we have looked at as part of this study suggests that any groundwater contamination is resulting from natural gas production activities,” said USGS hydrologist Tim Kresse. “However, this study does not speak to other wells that were not sampled, every chemical used during the hydraulic fracturing process, or water quality changes that might take longer to occur.

“It does provide a baseline to use to evaluate any possible changes in the future.”

The Fayetteville Shale serves as an unconventional gas reservoir across parts of six counties in north-central Arkansas, ranging in thickness from approximately 50 to 550 feet and varying in depth from approximately 1,500 to 6,500 feet below the ground surface. Drilling and production of gas wells began in 2004 and, as of April 2012, approximately 4,000 producing gas wells had been completed in the Fayetteville Shale.

The report, “Shallow Groundwater Quality and Geochemistry in the Fayetteville Shale Gas-Production Area, North-Central Arkansas, 2011” by Timothy M. Kresse, Nathaniel R. Warner, Phillip D. Hays, Adrian Down, Avner Vengosh, and Robert B. Jackson, is available online. Kresse and Hays are hydrologists with the USGS; other authors are with Duke University. The report was prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas Natural Resources Commission, Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission, Duke University, Faulkner County, Shirley Community Development Corporation, the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, and the USGS Groundwater Resources Program.

  • Comment

Comments (8)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
arkansasobserver
3065
Points
arkansasobserver 01/13/13 - 12:32 am
3
2

Probably won't change a thing

Those who have been ranting on this topic won't likely change their minds.

sevenof400
5868
Points
sevenof400 01/13/13 - 11:19 am
4
2

However, AO....

... I do hope the USGS plans to do this survey again at regular intervals to monitor any changes.

David
110
Points
David 01/13/13 - 01:00 pm
5
1

water wells

As a participant in this study I want to caution all who leap to false conclusions (the headline writer of this article especially) that the study was not designed to determine absolute presence or absence of contamination in water wells in Faulkner and Van Buren Counties. It was a study done by USGS as part of its continuing operations and is merely a part of a vast accumulation of data by the agency. Please read the complete study before making more assumptions about its purpose or findings.

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 01/13/13 - 10:46 pm
1
4

in other words

Unpublished

You still don't believe them...we get it.

Bad boy
752
Points
Bad boy 01/13/13 - 05:39 pm
1
4

Checks

Keep our checks alive. Only those that aren't getting them cry.

rathjen
148
Points
rathjen 01/13/13 - 06:24 pm
2
2

All citizens of Conway have a

All citizens of Conway have a stake in this issue. Conway Corporation with the blessing of the Mayor and City Council allowed drilling for natural gas under our primary water supply at Lake Brewer.

So lets hope that our primary water supply does NOT get contaminated, because we are dumping raw sewage from North Hills Subdivision into our backup water supply Lake Beaverfork.

SWIBC
1718
Points
SWIBC 01/13/13 - 08:55 pm
3
1

The City is not dumping

The City is not dumping anything in North Hills, that is a county subdivision and they have their own Treatment Plant that has been bonded and being paid for by the residents, just like up the road in Shadow Ridge Sub, but go ahead and tell some more lies and half-truths

rathjen
148
Points
rathjen 01/13/13 - 10:44 pm
1
2

The leach lines from the

The leach lines from the North Hills subdivision dump into Beaverfork Creek which feeds Lake Beaverfork.

The sphere of influence allows the city leaders to have the final say on that matter.

I just think that both ideas that I mentioned were really bad judgments. Disagree with me if you wish - that is the purpose of a spirited debate. Have a good evening.

Bad boy
752
Points
Bad boy 01/14/13 - 08:46 am
1
4

No checks.

Some of you are just smitten because you aren't in on the profit with us. Get over it. I love shale and gas. Keep rolling boys.

Back to Top