MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Rising political stars and personal friends, Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker worked quietly behind the scenes to coordinate public policy, avoid each other’s limelight and steer clear of political minefields that would haunt their campaigns, according to more than 1,000 pages of internal emails obtained by The Associated Press. But there was at least one pointed snub between them, too.
Ryan and Walker, both in their early 40s, have made Wisconsin a focus of the political universe. In June, Walker became the first governor to defeat a high-profile recall election. Ryan, the congressman from Janesville, Wis., ascended the national political stage in August when Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney picked him as his running mate. In the presidential race Wisconsin is a battleground state, one of a handful that will determine who moves in — or stays in — the White House.
The emails reviewed by the AP offered an unusual, behind-the-scenes glimpse of the interpersonal relationship between Ryan and Walker. Although as a congressman Ryan’s emails are exempt from disclosure under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, messages sent by Ryan or his aides to Walker or the governor’s staff are subject to Wisconsin’s open records law. The week after Ryan was tapped as Romney’s vice presidential candidate, the AP requested all such emails since Walker was elected in November 2010. It received 1,037 pages of them late Friday.
The day after Walker won his recall election, Ryan tried to call Walker to congratulate him. Was there a better phone number?
“He has his cell, but not able to get through often,” wrote Ryan’s scheduler, Sarah Peer. In another message, she wrote: “Yeah, they call each other frequently. I think Paul just wants to speak with him right away, which might not be a possibly (sic) at this time.”
The emails showed that aides to Ryan and Walker, both Republicans, coordinated closely at times on political issues on behalf of their bosses. As Wisconsin’s health services secretary, Dennis Smith, prepared to testify during a congressional hearing in January 2011 about the costs to states under President Barack Obama’s health care law, Walker sent a preview of Smith’s remarks to Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee and an outspoken opponent of the health care law.
“Good stuff,” wrote Conor Sweeney, the committee’s communications director. “Any chance you could hit the impact on Wisconsin families and Wisconsin’s budget from Medicaid expansions?”
Walker’s then-communications director, Chris Schrimpf, said he would forward the request to Smith’s chief of staff to revise the testimony.
The emails also show how Ryan and Walker sought to steer clear of sensitive political traps, and how Ryan was sensitive as early as September 2011 about offering any praise to government projects funded with money under Obama’s economic stimulus law. In August, the AP and other news organizations noted that Ryan — a vocal opponent of the stimulus law — sought to steer money under the program to companies in his home state, which Ryan first awkwardly denied then acknowledged to be true.
In the emails, Walker’s director of federal relations, Wendy Riemann, sent a message to Ryan’s aide, Kevin Seifert, to describe a new grant from the U.S. Veterans Affairs Department awarded for a local water project. Riemann asked whether Ryan wanted to be quoted in a press release praising the money being spent in Wisconsin.
“Not to create more work for you, but do you have any idea where the money for this grant came from? Was it stimulus/the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act?” Seifert replied. “Our concern is that, if it’s stimulus funds, we won’t want to highlight (and would think you guys wouldn’t, either) .... We generally don’t do press on things we actively oppose.”
Riemann responded that she would check the source of the money, which turned out not to be stimulus funding. “Feel free to proceed without us on this one,” Seifert wrote.
Sometimes, the rising political stars inadvertently overshadowed each other. Greta Van Susteren in July 2011 cancelled a television appearance by Walker on her Fox News cable program to instead interview Ryan about the debt ceiling.
“Did you mess with my trip scheduling for tomorrow?” Riemann asked Seifert. She included a smiley in her email, suggesting she wasn’t genuinely upset.
“If I did I’m really sorry and had no idea that’s what they were doing,” Seifert replied. “They didn’t mention Gov. Walker was on the schedule ... Had they even mentioned that you guys had something set, I wouldn’t have done that ... You know me, that’s not my style.”
Sometimes, the powerful politicians handled mundane requests, too. Seifert emailed Walker’s staff about a “random request from Laura Ingraham,” noting that the conservative radio talk show host had contacted him and needed help hiring a new executive producer. But he made clear what he thought of Ingraham’s request: “We’ve got a million other more pressing priorities,” he wrote.
The emails included at least one embarrassing snub by Ryan. Riemann, from the governor’s office, emailed the congressman’s office to ask for help coordinating a tour of the U.S. Capitol for Walker’s wife, Tonette, who expected to travel to Washington. Such tours are known as dome tours. Ryan’s staff said he was too busy to accommodate the request.
“Sorry, Paul doesn’t do dome tours,” Ryan’s scheduler wrote back. “He never has, so sorry we can’t be of assistance there.”
___
Associated Press writers Ted Bridis, Jack Gillum and Andrew Miga in Washington, and Roger Schneider in Milwaukee, contributed to this report.

Comments (24)
Add commentWell.......
What's the point? And it took four AP writers to construct it?
exactly
I kept reading this waiting for some embarrassing exposure. I guess they felt they HAD to write something considering they wasted all that time and effort going through all those emails.
Its funny that the two
Its funny that the two prevous post got thumbs down when every Conservative was reading it saying, "What now?" and every liberal was saying, "We got him!". I'm guessing the dislikes came from the left side of the room.
Like General said they HAD to say something to justify the investigation. Try as AP did to read something into the emails that just wasn't there.
You just have to laugh at the
You just have to laugh at the liberal mental misfiring that says relationships didn't matter when we were talking about Obama and Jeremiah Wright or Obama and Van Jones or Obama and Bill Ayres or Obama and *anybody* that Obama had any kind of relationship with but now, all of a sudden, relationships are supposed to matter when it's about Republicans even if they have to be negatively hinted at, or embellished, or even completely fabricated.
The disconnect is ridiculous.
Well.......
Ricks point thingy had some forgotten purpose........ I think it was to create a kinder gentler band of liberals. It failed as usual.
"You just have to laugh at
"You just have to laugh at the liberal mental misfiring that says relationships didn't matter when we were talking about Obama"
Only if you're a clueless conservative right-wing nut job.
Ok, give us the clue
Ok, give us the clue. Why is the relationship between Paul Ryan and Scott Walker deemed soooo important when the relationship between Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright, et al, was not?
Give it your best shot! Can't wait to see how you spin it! And how you, in the end, will only prove my point!
"Only if you're a clueless
"Only if you're a clueless conservative right-wing nut job."
Are you Quill's twisted pseudonym? That phase sounds all to familiar.
Did it ever occur to the liberials that conservatives are refered to as "right" for a reason. The only reason liberals are called "left" is because "wrong" hurts their tree hugging feelings
"That phase sounds all to
"That phase sounds all to familiar."
No, but that phrase sounds all too familiar, coming from a right-wing nut job.
Good grief...not a single
Good grief...not a single 'OMG' or 'relationships matter' from liberals yet that doesn't keep y'all from spouting the same ole tired bs. I know it's hard to find something relevant (and from the last decade...at least) to criticize liberals about, but...surely y'all can do better than simply making it up or rehashing the 50s/60s.
As a flaming liberal I don't get this story. Is it suppose to be shocking that two Republicans from the same state have the same interests and periodically talk to each other? All in all a pathetic example of a news story.