WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama won’t be posing for any photos in the voting booth on Election Day — he’s casting his ballot early.
Obama and first lady Michelle Obama said Monday they are both voting early, a nod to the campaign’s efforts to encourage supporters to vote absentee by mail or cast their ballot at an early voting location. Mrs. Obama said on Twitter that she dropped her absentee ballot in the mail on Monday, telling her followers, “I couldn’t wait for Election Day!” The first lady then tweeted out a photo of her posing with the envelope holding her absentee ballot.
Minutes later, the president said on Twitter that he was following Mrs. Obama’s example and intended to vote early in person in Illinois on Oct. 25 — three days after the final presidential debate. “If your state has early voting, join me,” Obama said on Twitter, directing followers to a link with more information about early voting.
At a rally at Ohio Wesleyan University in Delaware, Ohio, on Monday, the first lady enthusiastically shared the news of her early vote.
“This morning, I cast my vote early for Barack Obama,” she said to cheers. “Today! I voted for my husband. Yes! It felt so good. Right now, my absentee ballot is on its way to Illinois, my home state.” She added, “forgive me if I’m a little excited today. For me it was Election Day.”
Obama’s campaign said it was the first time a presidential nominee and his spouse will not vote in person on Election Day, reflecting their emphasis on early voting in several key battleground states. Obama dominated early voting in 2008, giving him an edge over Republican John McCain well before Election Day.
In Colorado, Florida, Iowa and North Carolina, for example, Obama banked so many votes early in the process that he won each state even though he lost the Election Day vote, according to voting data compiled by The Associated Press.
The carefully choreographed early voting announcement was part of a big push this week. Obama plans to discuss early voting in Ohio and Iowa on Wednesday, after Tuesday’s second presidential debate. The first lady was discussing early voting at events in Ohio on Monday, in North Carolina on Tuesday and in Wisconsin on Friday.
Obama has repeatedly urged supporters to vote early, placing an emphasis on absentee and early voting during recent rallies in battleground states such as Florida, Iowa and Ohio. The strategy aims to free up campaign workers and volunteers on Nov. 6 to focus on a smaller number of potential supporters and make sure they get to the polls.
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s campaign has targeted supporters who don’t typically vote in every election, placing a premium on getting those voters to cast early ballots. Most of Romney’s remaining supporters would be people who are much more likely to vote, regardless of whether they are contacted by the campaign.
Obama’s campaign has tried to bolster in-person early voting in states where that is already under way and reduce Republicans’ typical advantage in absentee voting. Democrats lead Republicans in Iowa in vote-by-mail ballots and in-person early voting; in Ohio, Democrats have requested and cast more ballots than Republicans. In Florida, Obama’s campaign has cut into the GOP’s advantage in absentee ballots.
Analysts estimate that about one-third of all voters could cast their ballots before Election Day.
Follow Ken Thomas at http://twitter.com/AP_Ken_Thomas

Comments (52)
Add commentWell.......
If they vote based on the job BO has done, I'm sure they voted for MR.
And now the strategy is in place. Hil falls on the sword. The buck stops here, she says. BUT...... we leave those decisions to experts! Experts Hil? Really? A rookie policeman would have responded to someone in trouble crying for help.
"The Fog of War"..... No, it's not the Clinton's new book, but it may be later. Hil says that's what caused the confusion following the attack and murders. We just didn't know. I agree with that.
So willie to the rescue again. He is labled slick for a reason.
Now BO can say we leave those decisions to experts like the Secretary of State. Thanks BO, so comforting.
So why?
Why did Paul Ryan vote against a bill that would have given additional money for embassy security? According to the Washington Post, "the GOP-controlled House proposed spending $1.934 billion for the State Department’s Worldwide Security Protection program -- well below the $2.15 billion requested by the Obama administration."
well
Just because the HOUSE votes for something, doesn't mean that Paul Ryan did.
Can you show me the link to his voting record?
And, if you really think about it, voting records aren't truly indicative of a politician. Case-in-point, once Obamacare had enough 'Yea' votes, a bunch of Democrats voted 'Nay'.
Politics indeed.
Happy to oblige
How about this:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/oct/16/joe-biden...
Or this:
http://thehill.com/video/house/261153--rep-chaffetz-white-house-claiming...
Or this:
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/10/985191/chaffetz-absolutely-...
ah ha
from your second link
"It seems to be a coordinated effort between the White House and the State Department, from Secretary Clinton to President Obama's White House," Chaffetz said on Monday of a decision to deny added security for American diplomats in Libya. "There was a very conscious decision made, I believe — my personal opinion is that they wanted the appearance of 'normalization' there in Libya, and building up of an infrastructure — putting up barbed wire on our facility would lead to the wrong impression — something that this administration didn’t want to have moving forward."
And, please....tell me more about how this administration sticks to a budget. I need a good laugh.
Is it me or does anyone else
Is it me or does anyone else find the humor in the irony that when you point out from a person's link a section that goes against their idea, that the vote dislike?
It good when you can use their own debate against them.
Old, New and 'Neo' GOP voter
Old, New and 'Neo' GOP voter suppression plan...
[Koch Industries Warns 45,000 Employees Of ‘Consequences’ If They Don’t Vote For Republicans]
"The Koch brothers’ $60 million pledge to defeat President Obama — along with their political network’s $400 million spending — make them two of the most influential conservatives this election."
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/10/15/1010581/koch-employee-votes/
"The Kochs are not the only ones attempting to influence employee votes. Two CEOs recently issued threats to employees about their jobs if Obama wins. And Murray Energy’s CEO allegedly coerced donations to Republican candidates after forcing coal miners to attend a pro-Romney rally without pay."
“Corporations are people, my friend”
yes
Elections do have consequences.
6 trillion of them, so far, with this President.
Ah, yes! Legacy of George W.
Ah, yes! Legacy of George W. Bush, In January 2001, the Congressional Budget Office projected that the federal government would run a total budget surplus of $3.5 trillion through 2008 if policy was unchanged and the economy continued according to forecast.
...
"The projected surplus was primarily the result of two factors. First was a big tax increase in 1993 that every Republican in Congress voted against, saying that it would tank the economy. This belief was wrong. The economy boomed in 1994, growing 4.1 percent that year and strongly throughout the Clinton administration."
...
The second major contributor to the budget surplus was Paygo, (pay as you go.)
"During the 2000 campaign, Mr. Bush warned that budget surpluses were dangerous because Congress might spend them, even though Paygo rules prevented this from happening."
YEAH! 'with this President'...not running two wars and Medicare prescription-drug plan off the books.
and yet
deficits have doubled under this administration.