• Syndicate content
  • Comment

Treasurer, top aide give conflicting testimony on audit

Posted: September 17, 2012 - 7:51pm

LITTLE ROCK — State Treasurer Martha Shoffner and one of her top investment advisers gave conflicting testimony before a legislative committee Monday over key findings in a state audit critical of how the office sold bonds.

Autumn Sanson, the treasurer’s chief investment officer, asked lawmakers whether she would be protected as a whistleblower after she was questioned why the treasurer’s office sold bonds before they matured, resulting in a lower yields. A lawyer for the Legislative Joint Auditing Committee said a judge would have to make that determination.

Sanson later testified that she advised Shoffner not to sell bonds before they matured. Shoffner told lawmakers that no one on her staff had spoken against the practice.

“I’m shocked,” Shoffner said after the meeting about Sanson’s comments. “I couldn’t even think for the rest of the meeting.”

An audit found that Shoffner’s office sold bonds from its investment portfolio to selected brokers before the bonds reached maturity and later purchased bonds from the same investment brokers. The audit concluded that if the bonds had been allowed to mature the state would have made an additional $58,172.

Shoffner, who was repeatedly asked during the three-hour meeting why the decision was made to sell the bonds early, did not give an explanation.

“I’ll have to research that,” she said.

Lawmakers appeared frustrated with Shoffner’s inability to answer specific questions.

“I think that’s a problem,” said Sen. Jonathan Dismang, R-Searcy. “We’re talking about a significant amount of money.”

The committee directed state auditors to review all bond sale and investment transactions made by the treasurer’s office since 2010. Sen. Bill Pritchard, R-Elkins, said he hopes the panel can meet again to discuss that audit in late October.

The committee was originally scheduled to discuss the audit Friday, but had to reschedule because Shoffner was a no-show, even after the panel issued a subpoena to compel her to attend.

State police served a subpoena on the state treasurer Friday afternoon in Newport.

Shoffner apologized to the committee Monday, saying she had planned to attend the meeting but opted to go to a meeting in Newport on an economic development project because she thought her chief deputy and other top staff could answer the committee’s questions. Top members of the treasurer’s staff attended the meeting but were not asked to testify.

The audit also found that the treasurer’s office did not record the loss separately from interest income, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A 2011 audit found that the treasurer’s office sold bonds to brokers before they were called or reached their maturity dates, purchased similar bonds from the same brokers, and then reported the sell/purchase activity.

  • Comment

Comments (10)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
TrickyToo
784
Points
TrickyToo 09/17/12 - 09:28 pm
5
0

Very interesting.

Shouldn't there be a committee that makes these decisions?

endorphine44
90
Points
endorphine44 09/18/12 - 09:21 am
6
0

apparently they also admitted

apparently they also admitted that no one in her office is a certified CPA, nor have any of them ever been Series 7 certified (Series 7 is for investments, derivatives, etc)
http://www.aitraining.com/series7.htm

How do you run the State Treasury successfully without a CPA or a Series 7 certified employee anywhere on staff? To me, it's the same as the Arkansas Game and Fish not having any wildlife biologist on staff.

I'm not saying they can't get by and make things work, but how much better would that office (and our money) be if they had a few qualified people to help guide it?

http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/d93ffc562a5d414783fee8857ec26ae2/A...

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 09/18/12 - 09:25 am
4
0

remember

Unpublished

In politics and business and life in general.....it's not WHAT you know, it's WHO you know.

DJB1971
15047
Points
DJB1971 09/18/12 - 09:54 am
2
0

Wow!!

No CPA or securities licensed individual on staff????

That alone is enough reason for the Governor to ask the Treasurer to resign. Failing to hire such individuals is a sign of gross incompetence and gross mismanagement of the department.

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 09/18/12 - 12:17 pm
3
0

incompetence? mismanagement?

Unpublished

or simply "close enough for government work"?

endorphine44
90
Points
endorphine44 09/18/12 - 03:00 pm
4
1

what's worse is she's won

what's worse is she's won election to that seat twice....so what's worse, her incompetence or ours as a population?
You can bet she's not the only unqualified person in office in Arkansas, just the latest one to get caught.

BuzzBy
17777
Points
BuzzBy 09/18/12 - 12:12 pm
5
0

One Word

Unpublished

KICKBACKS
The good ole boy system runs on kickbacks.

ArkyBass
746
Points
ArkyBass 09/18/12 - 12:22 pm
1
1

State Employee

Try hiring a qualified anything in the State system. Salaries low and no sign of increase (it the economy Beebe says). Voters seem to support that... Application process is cumbersome and confusing.

Once hired your working with unqualified do nothings who have figured out the state system and can't be fired.

My goal...Unqualified do nothing!!

Now if your talking about a department/commision heads, seems they can hire thier buddys for big bucks...Then they hire the relatives for the unqualified do nothing positions. (How will I ever get one?)

Not sure about the solution but a cost of living raise every now and then for state employees might help keep some of the 'working people' in there.

DJB1971
15047
Points
DJB1971 09/18/12 - 12:58 pm
1
0

Agree, but...

I agree with most of your comments.

However, stating that they don't pay enough to attract qualified people doesn't seem to agree with the salaries being paid.

http://www.arkansasonline.com/right2know/statesalaries/?appSession=03232...

ArkyBass
746
Points
ArkyBass 09/18/12 - 03:43 pm
1
0

Good One!

DJB1971, Good link, I would think someone on that list should be qualified!

Back to Top