• Syndicate content
  • Comment

Lack of pay raises at UCA has faculty looking elsewhere

Posted: July 2, 2012 - 6:14pm

For years, the University of Central Arkansas has put off giving professors pay raises while the struggling university tried to climb out of fiscal distress, officials said. Now, just as UCA is on the cusp of recovery, faculty are starting to think about leaving unless they get a pay raise soon.

“It hasn’t happened yet, but it’s going to begin to directly impact students as they show up and see their favorite professors are gone,” UCA Faculty Senate President Kevin Browne said.

Faculty pay has taken the brunt of UCA’s efforts to balance its budget and climb out of fiscal mess brought on by years of prior mismanagement, Browne said.

In 2008, after years of over-extending itself by buying property out-of-pocket, UCA found itself struggling to pay its bills month to month without borrowing, President Tom Courtway said.

“We spent more than we took in for a period of years,” he said. “Other times, we took money in the checking account and paid for capital expenditures, and we just shouldn’t have done it.”

This May, UCA’s Board of Trustees approved raising the university’s tuition rate and fees to pay for critical needs, rising costs and a salary adjustment for Courtway, who took over as interim president in September and became president in December. But the 2.08 percent tuition hike doesn’t cover faculty or staff cost-of-living or merit raises, officials said. Extra money from the state, about $589,000, wouldn’t cover costs for a pay raise — a 1 percent bonus for faculty and staff would cost the university about $850,000, Courtway said.

“Our faculty is excellent,” Courtway said, adding that he wanted to give raises. “They are great teachers. We don’t want to lose our faculty — that’s something that’s essential.”

Despite the money problems, UCA employees did see one pay raise. Classified employees received a 2 percent pay increase last year, and nonclassified employees, which includes professors, last saw a pay increase in 2010 at 2.25 percent, wrote Graham Gillis, associate vice president of human resources, in an email. Browne said faculty so far have been patient, but he doesn’t believe that can last. Inflation during the recession has meant one raise in four years isn’t keeping up, he said.

“There is a limit to our idealism,” Browne said. “People are leaving. People are looking [for other jobs].”

UCA’s pay is lagging behind other institutions too. At the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, the average, full-time professor salary for the 2010-2011 year is about $103,600, according to UA records. At UCA, average, full-time professor salary is $78,800 for the same time period, UCA officials confirmed. Average pay among the 16 Southern states that make up the Southern Regional Education Board puts the average regional salary for professors at $84,000 for the 2009-2010 school year, according to a UCA executive summary study for 2011.

In that summary, a survey of faculty at UCA showed faculty showed “...frustration with salary levels as well as inequities and the lack of tangible recognition for exceptional job performance. Responses also address low morale, due in part to these and other salary-related issues.”

Total salaries make up about 57 percent of UCA’s budget expenditures, according to the fiscal 2013 budget. Courtway said the university doesn’t have sufficient funds to pay for an increase in faculty salaries this year unless enrollment increases. Total enrollment has decreased in recent years, but officials hope to see a turnaround, they said.

Currently, raises are not in the budget, Courtway said.

UCA is trying to rebuild its unrestricted reserves before giving raises, but that fund is expected to fall short of what officials want to see.

The university’s goal for its tightest fiscal month, July, is about $14 million, Courtway said. He said estimates show the actual amount in reserves is expected to be about $8.5 million by the end of this month.

At the same time, the state’s allotment to its own universities has been flat several years in a row, said Shane Broadway, interim director of the state’s higher education department. The state did increase overall pay to UCA by about $311,000 this fiscal year, but health insurance alone went up about $550,000 at UCA. When considering inflation, universities — like UCA — are actually getting less from the state, Broadway said.

What UCA can pay faculty matters because better pay means better teachers, Broadway said.

“Certainly, we want to have the type of faculty our students are looking for,” he said.

  • Comment

Comments (46)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
sevenof400
5868
Points
sevenof400 07/02/12 - 10:25 pm
6
3

Browne is very mistaken when he says...

...Faculty pay has taken the brunt of UCA’s efforts to balance its budget and climb out of fiscal mess brought on by years of prior mismanagement.

Look at the exorbitant increase in student tuition, room, board and fees if you want to see who has taken the brunt of UCA's efforts....

This is exactly why Thompson, Hardin, Meadors, and every board of trustee member during that time should be investigated for possible misconduct and / or mismanagement of funds and / or gross incompetence.

Building stained sidewalks, buying every piece of property near UCA, the idiotic move to D1, and spending money on efforts NOT related to improving the quality of a UCA degree are just a few of the root causes of the current financial problems.

Why shouldn't the people responsible for these decisions be held accountable?

ProfessorEmeritus
14
Points
ProfessorEmeritus 07/03/12 - 04:36 pm
4
0

Comment on University funding

Yes, you can always argue that administrators or even faculty could have spent various funds differently. Certainly with every Chair or Dean I had, that was the case. Most University money come to the University with specific strings attached on how it can be spent. As with any organization, raises must come from funds that are recurring, not one time funds or one time gifts.

Of the items below, property and cost of moving to D1 may have come from recurring funds but in athletics case, it mainly came from student fees and vendor money. The faculty were very opposed to these expenditures. The sidewalks were one time grant money but we didn't like the concept at the time because we hadn't gotten raises in three years, we got on the next year but that's beside the point.

":Building stained sidewalks, buying every piece of property near UCA, the idiotic move to D1, and spending money on efforts NOT related to improving the quality of a UCA degree are just a few of the root causes of the current financial problems."

MUDFLAP
178
Points
MUDFLAP 07/03/12 - 09:09 am
3
0

Agreed.

Let me start off by sayin Im wrong. But, out here in the real world, shouldnt pay be based on merit? The article mentioned merit raises, but why do people in public instutions expect cost of living raises every time new figures from some economist says it cost X amount more to live today than last year?
If the staff wants to leave and go where they can make more money, thats great. All for it. I'll help em pack. They have worked hard to educate themselves,they should market themselves where they get the best bang for the buck. Thats what this country is all about.
Students may follow them, thats their right also.

Fire away!

Just sayin...

ucantbserious
25486
Points
ucantbserious 07/03/12 - 09:41 am
4
0

No pay raises?

Join the club.

Scarlet Sims
1976
Points
Scarlet Sims 07/03/12 - 09:56 am
6
2

Tuition increase

The most recent increase of tuition at UCA is among the lowest among institutions statewide. Other schools raised tuition a lot more than UCA, and those schools have fewer financial woes from which to recover.

Shane Broadway, interim higher education department director, told me that, if the state would increase funding to higher education institutions, tuition would be lower or stay where it is now. But that isn't going to happen any time soon because the state is busy focusing on funding primary education.

If Arkansans want an economic engine that produces skilled and educated labor that, in turn, draws industry, then maybe we should consider paying an adequate wage for professors' salaries. Just saying 'so long' won't help anyone.

ucantbserious
25486
Points
ucantbserious 07/03/12 - 10:14 am
4
0

Hmm

"The most recent increase of tuition at UCA is among the lowest among institutions statewide. Other schools raised tuition a lot more than UCA"

Are those other schools rivaling the U of A for what they charge on a per-credit-hour basis? They've got a lot of catching up to do.

sevenof400
5868
Points
sevenof400 07/03/12 - 11:01 am
5
3

Scarlet, you need to look at UCA over a

much longer time frame. UCA has historically gorged itself on money from students. Go back to 1980 and look at the raises in tuition, fees, room, etc. From the early 80's until the early part of the 00's, the tuition at UCA increased about 700% (and that is NOT a typo).

The value of a UCA degree certainly did not increase at anything near that rate....

All of this plays into the waste, misuse, and stupid decisions UCA has made with respect to money over the years. UCA presidents and board of trustee members have allowed money to spent on non academic costs like drunken sailers in port for a long overdue liberty without being held accountable for their actions and decisions.

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 07/03/12 - 11:03 am
5
2

Look on the bright side!

Unpublished

Check out the nice football turf!!

sevenof400
5868
Points
sevenof400 07/03/12 - 11:08 am
6
2

That turf STILL looks like

a Maalox moment.

ArkansasTraveler
795
Points
ArkansasTraveler 07/03/12 - 01:13 pm
5
3

I posted this on 04-05-2011

and it seems more true now than ever.. Here it is again for your reading pleasure.

"Without going into a lot of boring detail I'd like to address the lack of communication across the various departments at UCA and the lack of professionalism displayed by various department chairs, professors, and support staff at the university. It seems as if no one is really in charge and each department is left to handle things as they deem proper (or not handle, as the case may be).

Parking lots are torn up for construction and/or carnivals yet more and more students are issued parking permits; student records are not maintained accurately; transfer students don't get full credit for courses transferred from community colleges in the U of A system; academic counselors don't have a clue what courses are required for graduation; professors don't seem to have a clue about good teaching methods; professors don't respond to email or telephone requests for student appointments; students are left to "guess" what they need to do to succeed; the list goes on and on..

It is no wonder that the drop-out rate is so high. I'm left to wonder how we manage to get anyone graduated in a system so flagrantly broken."

Board of Regents (or whatever you call yourselves now): How about fixing this university so a degree from here actually is worth something??

Back to Top