• Comment

Lawsuit filed to overturn Ark. gay marriage ban

Posted: July 3, 2013 - 8:29am

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — A group of 11 same-sex couples from Arkansas on Tuesday asked a judge to overturn the state's ban on gay marriage, the latest effort aimed at repealing the amendment after recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings supporting gay couples.

The lawsuit filed in Pulaski County Circuit Court seeks to strike down the constitutional amendment voters approved in 2004 that defines marriage as between a man and a woman. The amendment also bars the state from recognizing same-sex marriages from other states.

"Gays and lesbians are a distinct group, singled out due to their sexual orientation to be denied rights enjoyed by all other adult groups," the lawsuit states. "They are unequal in the eyes of the state of Arkansas and their families are denied the same respect as officially sanctioned families of opposite-sex individuals."

The lawsuit was filed less than a week after the U.S. Supreme Court issued two rulings supporting same-sex couples. Justices on June 26 cleared the way for gay marriages to resume in California and struck down a federal law denying benefits to married gay couples. Justices, however, did not rule on the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans.

The day after the ruling, a group asked the Arkansas attorney general's office to approve the language of a proposed ballot measure that would repeal the 2004 amendment. If the language is certified by the AG's office, the group must gather at least 78,133 signatures from registered voters to get the measure on the ballot next year.

Four of the couples suing the state were legally married in Iowa. Several of the couples suing sought marriage licenses from their county clerks but were turned down, according to the suit.

A spokesman for Attorney General Dustin McDaniel said his office was still reviewing the lawsuit.

The head of the conservative group that campaigned for the amendment in 2004 said he wasn't sure how the couples could challenge the ban in state court since it's written in the Arkansas constitution. Jerry Cox, president of the Family Council, said he was confident the amendment could withstand any legal challenge.

"If the Arkansas marriage amendment was legally suspect, it would have been challenged a long time ago," Cox said. "This law has been on the books for almost 10 years, and it's as solid as any marriage law anywhere in the country."

Cheryl Maples, the attorney for the plaintiffs, said she believed state court was the best venue to challenge the amendment, which she said conflicted with the Arkansas constitution's guarantee of equal rights. She cited the state Supreme Court's ruling in 2002 striking down Arkansas' anti-sodomy law as unconstitutional.

In 2011, the state Supreme Court struck down an initiated act approved by voters that banned unmarried couples living together from adopting or fostering children. That ban was aimed primarily at gay couples.

"I think that enough change has taken place in the last 10 years that it's time for this to be heard," Maples said.

  • Comment
Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
justask
265
Points
justask 07/05/13 - 03:30 pm
3
0
Where can I sign?

I'd be happy to sign the petition, and so would my family members. It would help to know where to go.

reader
18438
Points
reader 07/06/13 - 11:19 am
1
0
Oh come on Jerry

"The head of the conservative group that campaigned for the amendment in 2004 said he wasn't sure how the couples could challenge the ban in state court since it's written in the Arkansas constitution. Jerry Cox, president of the Family Council, said he was confident the amendment could withstand any legal challenge."

Written in the constitution is a bit different than amended to it during a Republican scheme to bring right wing voters out in 2004 to keep G.W. in office.

As for justask, once the proposed amendment to our constitution has cleared the Attorney Generals Office, the petitions will be passed around to gain the number needed to place it on the ballot, the same way the discriminatory amendment which scarred our sacred constitution in the 2004 election. This effort may fail due to the broad based support needed to accomplish us.

Overturning the amendment in the courts is an easier method since proving to the courts the inequality in the law under the Arkansas and U.S. Constitution as a violation to "equal protection under the law".

Back to Top