• Syndicate content
  • Comment

How a bill really becomes a law

Posted: March 19, 2013 - 4:49pm

How does a bill really become a law? We all learned about the process in school, but what really matters are the people who sit in those legislative seats making decisions each day.

Most state legislators want to do the right thing and want to serve their constituents, but they must absorb an impossible amount of information in a short amount of time and can’t become experts on everything. Also, because they campaigned in order to get something done, they are reluctant to oppose each other too aggressively lest they be treated the same way in return.

Because of all that, a bill has a decent chance of passing if it seems to be a good idea at first glance, if the legislator sponsoring it has credibility, and if other issues attract more attention.

The good news is that state government is not paralyzed by gridlock, that Republicans and Democrats can work together, and that Arkansans are not subjected to the kind of daily mudslinging that comes from Washington.

On the other hand, bills can slip through the cracks more easily here than in the nation’s capital.

Here’s how. Once a bill is written, it next must be considered in committee. Legislators try to be deliberate there, but they often must consider a long list of bills and often can devote only enough time to hear from a few witnesses. The bill’s sponsor, a fellow legislator, makes his or her case sitting at the end of the same long table where the committee members sit. Sometimes these debates last an hour or more, but often it’s much less. The chair then asks what the legislators want to do, and someone calls for the motion to pass or not pass. It takes a conscious act for a legislator to break the momentum, and there are consequences for doing so. Then they vote.

If the bill passes the committee, there is a good chance it will pass the full house because legislators rely on the judgements of the committee members. Once it passes one house, it moves into committee in the other. If it passes that house’s committee without amendments, it probably will become law.

Thankfully, the process takes long enough that really bad ideas tend to be stopped. Legislators in one house catch details missed by those in the other. Interest groups mobilize their memberships to educate and persuade their representatives. As a last defense, the governor can veto a bill, and while the Legislature can override it with a simple majority, his gesture can draw attention to a problem.

By now, legislators have been away from their homes, jobs and families for two months and are ready for this session to end.

However, there’s still lots of work to be done and probably not much more than a month to do it. A slew of tax cut bills hasn’t really been considered. Legislators and the governor are still trying to determine whether and how to expand government-funded health care options for the working poor. The budget, as always, has yet to be written.

After Monday’s filing deadline, legislators had proposed 2,560 bills, or 325 more than were filed in 2011. More than 650 were filed on the last possible day, and some of those were little more than titles with the text of the bill to be added later.

Each bill represents a potential change to Arkansas life. Many will be well considered, but many will just slip through. Some of those will be significant and all will have the force of law.

Let’s hope legislators keep in mind that it’s usually better to pass no law than a bad one. After all, while Arkansas is an imperfect place, it doesn’t need 2,560 changes – at least not all in three months, and not all coming from Little Rock.

Steve Brawner is an independent journalist in Arkansas. His blog — Independent Arkansas — is linked at arkansasnews.com. His e-mail address is brawnersteve@mac.com

  • Comment

Comments (3)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
reader
12588
Points
reader 03/21/13 - 11:15 am
1
0

Agreed Mr. Brawner

You are an adept journalist and have a keen view of the process which many of us do not see. The short session forces all the work to be sped up, which is not a benefit to the people. It does not allow many of those who are affected, to learn of bills, and then respond in a timely manner. Something must be changed in the method of our legislation. We need more control by the people on certain measures which allows the people a chance to approve or disapprove of certain actions the legislature takes. Thank you for being an eye on the legislature for us of either or any party.

ucantbserious
25486
Points
ucantbserious 03/21/13 - 11:16 am
1
1

I'm just a bill...

sitting her on Capital Hill.

BuzzBy
17777
Points
BuzzBy 03/21/13 - 12:49 pm
2
1
Igor Rabinowitz
5713
Points
Igor Rabinowitz 03/21/13 - 12:58 pm
2
0

He left out an important part

In these times, money, and who has it, and who's willing to donate it to campaigns (and pay speaking fees, and back-door book deals, and provide private jet rides, and on) is the most telling factor in what bills get proposed and passed.

Money. Not you, not me, money.

Back to Top