• Syndicate content
  • Comment

Why rearm airline passengers with knives?

Posted: March 18, 2013 - 4:16pm

For reasons that have baffled a nation, the U.S. Transportation Security Administration has decided to allow airline passengers to carry knives.

Well, not knife knives, but, rather, pocketknives.

Still, under the new rules, passengers will be able to carry a blade that is up to 2.36 inches long and up to a half-inch wide, as long as it isn’t a fixed blade or doesn’t lock into place.

It truly is hard to figure.

Was it just a sense that, heck, things have been going so well in the air since Sept. 11, 2001, why not rearm passengers?

We’re sure there are reasons for this that only bureaucrats can understand, but they probably should be rethinking this.

For one thing, the al-Qaeda terrorists managed to bring down four planes and the World Trade Center, damage the Pentagon, kill thousands and start a war with, what? Box cutters, for crying out loud!

True, box cutters (and razor blades) will still be prohibited. How could they not be given their role on Sept. 11?

But we’re going to let people board planes with knives after getting along just fine without for more than 12 years?

If not altogether happy, the public at least has grown accustomed to the odd rules about plane safety, including the occasional confiscation of a tin of foie gras (yeah, no kidding, this happened) and the prohibition of more than 3.4 oz. of shampoo in any one container.

(As the satirical publication The Onion put it, you should be able to carry a knife or shampoo onto a plane, but not both. Presumably the combination would simply be too dangerous.)

With this change, we now run the risk of an arm’s race in the air.

If the passenger behind you might have a knife, shouldn’t you have your own knife, on the well-established principle that the only thing that will stop a bad guy with a knife on a plane is a good guy with a knife on a plane?

Or, at least, shouldn’t you be able to wear a Kevlar collar to protect your carotid artery?

But, seriously, what is the inconvenience to the public to not allow knives of any sort on a plane?

And isn’t the peace of mind of complete prohibition worth something.

— Kingston Daily Freeman

  • Comment

Comments (2)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
reader
12588
Points
reader 03/28/13 - 12:33 pm
0
1

Why not

just give everyone on board an AR 15 with a 60 round clip?

ARVoiceofLogic
4505
Points
ARVoiceofLogic 03/28/13 - 12:39 pm
1
0

No no no no

That is only for church services in Arkansas.

BuzzBy
17777
Points
BuzzBy 03/28/13 - 12:52 pm
1
0

Statement Below

Unpublished

Shows just how stupid the writer is!!!

Or, at least, shouldn’t you be able to wear a Kevlar collar to protect your carotid artery?

Everyone should know that Kevlar does little to slowdown a knife it is made to stretch and not break thus stopping a bullet but a knife will cut right thur it. Now maybe like a mesh collar like the gloves worn by butchers ETC.

BTW I have carried a pocket knife since I was 5 yrs old a Barlow back then and when you lived on a farm you never knew when you might need to cut something like baling twine ETC. Everyone sported a Buck knife on their belt when I went to CJHS and CHS.

And NO ONE ever got stuck at school.

Back to Top