• Syndicate content
  • Comment

Armed faculty, students not needed at UCA

Posted: March 15, 2013 - 8:19pm

The University of Central Arkansas may be headed away from today’s rush to tote pistols so as to be ready for violence on campuses, in churches and other places.

President Tom Courtway, the UCA Faculty and the school’s police chief have come out in opposition to a bit of legislation in the current General Assembly that would allow colleges to approve firearms on campus. Holders of concealed carry permits could take their pistols to class, to labs and to gym workouts.

Our thinking is right in line with Courtway et al.

UCA needs to be gun-free. So does Hendrix and so does Central Baptist. In no way are we in the ranks of those who want complete elimination of firearms, but there is a time and place for the legitimate possession and use of pistols, rifles and shotguns — and a college campus is not the place.

A professor packing a pistol just does not grab us as desirable. Should this professor be so equipped, do we really think he or she could or would stop a crazy who walks into the room with an assault rifle or a handgun or a pipe bomb? Is a student with a permit sitting in a lecture going to whip out a gun and stop an attack?

Neither is likely.

What is much more apt to occur is a teacher being extremely nervous and distracted knowing that somewhere in the room or hall full of students are a few who are packing guns. If the teacher says, “Today we will have a pop quiz,” will another kind of pop take place?

Just keep guns off the campus. Period. No exceptions. No special cases or privileged persons.

Some UCA students are hunters, and hunting is a legitimate use of firearms. The campus, though, is not a field with game animals that may be in season. A sophomore business major may want to get in a little squirrel hunting in the afternoon when classes are over, and this is fine. But that sophomore should not have a .22 rifle or a shotgun on campus, not even in the trunk of a car or behind the seat of a pickup.

Possibly, just possibly, consideration could be given a secure storage facility to meet this scenario or for a dormitory resident who hunts or who competes in skeet shooting. If there is such a need, the UCA Police Department would seem to be logical, and it is in operation around the clock so the hunter who gets back after dark or who gets out before dawn could be accommodated.

Nationwide, we are in too much of a dither over changing the rules on guns. Yes, there have been tragedies such as the mass shootings and the more numerous one-on-one killings with firearms. But virtually all the dialogue and the few instances of action in the form of new laws have been aimed at the implements, the firearms, and not at the perpetrators, the violently angered and the mentally unstable who make use of guns.

At UCA and other campuses, the surroundings are thick with people in their late teens and early 20s. Life is changing for these folks. Doors are opening. Opportunities are coming into view. Older persons who have the assets of experience and education are on campuses to direct and nourish the students.

Neither students or faculty, nor any one else on campus, should have to contend with the volatile issue of firearms nearby.

  • Comment

Comments (8)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
reader
12742
Points
reader 03/15/13 - 10:02 pm
2
2

Thanks for taking

a reasonable stand on this issue. Guns are made to kill. People are not, and we should keep it that way on our campuses, all of them.

arkansasobserver
3075
Points
arkansasobserver 03/16/13 - 10:26 am
3
4

Agree with this part:

"Nationwide, we are in too much of a dither over changing the rules on guns. Yes, there have been tragedies such as the mass shootings and the more numerous one-on-one killings with firearms. But virtually all the dialogue and the few instances of action in the form of new laws have been aimed at the implements, the firearms, and not at the perpetrators, the violently angered and the mentally unstable who make use of guns."

But what goes unsaid in this article is that the "dither" over guns was a stragegy, planned and executed by Bloomberg, Feinstein and their liberal friends to remove guns from society. The plan sat waiting until Sandy Hook, which was unashamedly used to launch it. Nobody should be surprised that there is a backlash in the opposite direction.

crypted quill
9972
Points
crypted quill 03/16/13 - 12:10 pm
4
3

"The plan sat waiting until

"The plan sat waiting until Sandy Hook, which was unashamedly used to launch it."

How disgustingly paranoid and insane to make such a reprehensible statement...your 'wing-nut' mental illness is frightening.

"The world is grown so bad, that wrens make prey where eagles dare not perch."

arkansasobserver
3075
Points
arkansasobserver 03/18/13 - 07:59 am
2
2

Quill

If you got your news anyplace but MSNBC, you would know that Blooomberg funded a committee to prepare for the next shooting event, which happened to be Sandy Hook, to launch their anti-gun campaign. It's not paranoia, it's reality. They don't bother to hide their strategy anymore.

crypted quill
9972
Points
crypted quill 03/18/13 - 08:44 am
1
2

HaHa!And 'Blooomberg' is a

HaHa!

And 'Blooomberg' is a good Liberal Republican?

REALLY?????

Is that a... Al-jazeera story or The Daily Caller?

notthisboy
1728
Points
notthisboy 03/16/13 - 08:46 pm
3
3

No Quill

It is true, our great folks in Washington DC have done nothing to stop the weapons in the hands of the criminal, just the law abiding citizens. Just more of the same old liberal lets do something that feels good and get a lot of media attention.

The ban that just came out of committee has no chance of ever passing. The bans did not work the last time and will not work now. It is time to put in place enhanced sentences for those who use firearms to commit a crime.

If you cannot understand that a criminal will get a gun no matter what, then you are part of the problem. It has nothing to do with being right or left dingbats, it has to do with people elected to office who have absolutely no common sense.

crypted quill
9972
Points
crypted quill 03/17/13 - 08:19 am
2
1

You are correct NTB. "Warren

You are correct NTB.

"Warren hammered the NRA, naming the group among the “armies of lobbyists [that] are fighting to rig the system so that the public remains in the dark.” [...]

“If as many people were dying of a mysterious disease as innocent bystanders are dying from firearms, a cure would be our top priority,” Warren said. “But we don’t even have good data on gun violence. Why? Because the NRA and the gun industry lobby made it their goal to prevent any serious effort to document the violence.”"

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/03/14/1194117/-Elizabeth-Warren-takes...

Washington, D.C. is 'broken' 'buy' the bought-and-paid-for 'Teapublican' NRA god&gun psychodoodle manufacturer lobby.

ucantbserious
25486
Points
ucantbserious 03/18/13 - 11:20 am
2
0

What's the answer?

This is one of those issues that is hotly debated by people on both sides of the issue with strong feelings about what they believe.

People have their own opinions or beliefs regarding how people would react in an emergency. Chief James obviously feels that having armed students and teachers on campus would be more of a liability than a help. We also need to keep in mind that UCA did have a shooting on campus a few years ago where a young man was killed. I'm sure this occurrence was in the forefront of the chief's mind when he weighed in on this issue. What would have been the outcome if there were armed students around when that shooting occurred?

With shared on-campus housing one thing to consider is if someone who is not licensed to carry a concealed weapon getting their hands on their roommate's CCW.

How many students would even be eligible to get a CCL? You must be at least 21, correct? What percentage of the UCA student body is at least 21? For traditional students, it wouldn't be until most students were either in there senior year or late junior year.

Back to Top