Thread commenters often ask questions and make assumptions about me which I find extremely hilarious. Most recently by commenting on “christianity”, K-Life and Kanakuk Kamps, the assumptions and presumptions have grown to an even greater quantity and critical nature than usual. Probably because I do not believe things others do, or in the same way they do. They ask why I hate christianity? I don't. They ask why I am bitter? I'm not. I am a very happy free person. Maybe this will explain it for those who do not understand my happiness, my freedom, and my choices.
Christianity is a religion which has more schisms and threads than any other religion in the world. As a young boy I asked my Mother why there were so many different brands of churches if they all believed in the same thing. She explained they had differences in their beliefs and often the people who made up the church had differences of opinion. Sometimes one church would break into two or even three because the differences in opinions caused disruption in the operation of the church, selection of a pastor, etc. People not getting along with one another was the main reason for the different versions of “christian” theology. She taught me to pay more attention to the words of Jesus, which we through faith believe, even though different books in the bible did not even record his words exactly the same, and in fact not even in our language. She explained it was the meaning of his words, and not their exact recording which made good sense, even for people who were not believers in the overall text of the bible. She studied and read the bible, attending many bible classes and even teaching bible classes to others.
Through the years, the branding of “christianity” has grown ever more prominent, and the many churches, televangelists, and proponents of the religion have moved to make inroads to governing our nation of free people. It is obvious to even the weakest minds, this is not a great thing. It would be like having a herd of cats running the nation and lead to division, disruption and angst on the part of many. Yes, I see the many brands of “christianity” as a herd of cats. Also, it has come to light, mostly in recent years, there were many “gospels” of the bible which did not agree with the ideals of those who, while in power, chose what “gospels” or “books” to be included in the bible.
The nation in which we live was founded on freedom. Freedom allows people to understand, believe, and practice religion or not, as they prefer. It is a great thing freedom. Many claim freedom of religion does not include freedom from religion. If it did not include freedom from religion, then would we not be required to attend religious services of all the religions? No, because along with freedom of religion we have freedom of choice, a freedom not particularly promoted by the general “christian” brands. My mother, being an intelligent woman of little schooling but vast common sense, encouraged me to develop my own beliefs through study and make my own decisions about participation in so called “organized religion”.
The principles described in the bible, set forth in the words of Jesus, are sensible, honorable, and good lessons for any civilization to follow. They make really good common sense. A common good for all men and women, and a sharing of the blessings of this great garden earth God blessed us with. In recent years though, many of the “christian” brands, especially evangelical types have formed themselves into what a few years ago called itself the “moral majority”. Although the name has faded from the common nomenclature it still exists under another name often referred to as the “right wing”. Oddly enough I do not find this segment of “christianity” to be followers of the examples set forth by the words and actions of Jesus in the bible. I do not recall in the miracle of the loaves and fishes, anyone asking “Do you have a job?” “Can you pay for your meal?” “Tell me your background before I heal your sickness, because I don’t help those I don’t approve of?” “Are you just a taker?”
Many in the world today, including many who call themselves “christians” do ask these questions, for reasons I will never understand. Not everyone born to the world, is capable or able to be a full participant in the grow up, work for a living, and have a nice life scenario. Yet so many judge these people as evil, lazy, and wasteful, not as children of God who have not had the opportunity in life, which others have. They do not feel the government (us, we the people) should provide healthcare, when it is completely possible to do so, and is done in many countries with less freedoms than our own. They do not believe the government (us, we the people) should provide food to the hungry, even hungry children, or shelter for those who for no reason of their own, have none. They do not believe in being their brothers keepers, a lesson my Mother herself taught me, through example and through practice. A lesson also taught by Jesus. Many evangelical brands even teach us that God wants us to all be wealthy! Even though it could never be true in any economy, nation or civilization. There will always be those with more and those with less. But in truth we are all rich. We have life, we have opportunity, we have this great garden earth to see and care for, share, and so many blessings, they could not be counted. One lesson I did learn from the words of Jesus, was to share the blessings of the world, given to us by God, and judge not anyone by the clothes they wear, the life they live, nor the decisions or sins they may commit. Judgment is reserved for God himself, and not by anyone else. This is why I do not choose to refer to myself as a “christian” but rather, a follower of Jesus. It is my freedom of choice, by the grace of God, and the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (19)
Add commentSo, Reader, did Jesus address homosexuality?
Yes, He did. He did so by sending His Spirit to superintend the writings of Paul such that what Paul wrote was precisely what Jesus intended, so much so that it could be said to be “God-breathed.” Jesus condemned homosexuality by means of Paul’s condemnation of homosexuality. And therefore, to deny that homosexuality is sinful is to deny Jesus Himself, and is irreconcilable with true, biblical Christianity.
So, my man... How far do you follow this "Jesus"? Just until he walks down a path that you do not wish to take?
You, my man, are a hypocrite.. Maybe just as much of a hypocrite as those whom you paint with that wide brush of yours..
Ya think??
^^^^^THIS^^^^^^
110 % Agree
Since READER believes the Bible says different things even about Jesus himself then READER can pick and choose what he wants to believe.
Which is just what Satan\Lucifer\The Devil\The Great Deceiver wants his subjests to believe. A friend I know always said "Satan doesn't have to get you to do something that is bad he just has to keep you from doing what is right"
But for the very reason READER wants to read the Bible his way and only his way is the same reason for all the different flavors of christians. But there are all sorts of Muslims too and different ethnic tribes that war on each other daily.
yep
Can you say Sunni and Shiite.
Was watching the Military Channel last night, and they revealed that in OBL's compound they found documents where many Muslim nations were getting more upset with Al-Qaeda than the even the U.S.A., because the latest series of terrorists attacks were killing more Afghan/Saudi/etc citizens than U.S. soldiers.
My blog post
did not mention anything about Paul, or his writings, or homosexuality, or hypocrites. Your response though, clearly defines you as a "christian" (synonymous with judgmental hypocrite) I think if you are looking for a hypocrite, you will find him in your mirror.
Well............
No, it's you read. You are horrible. Leave kids alone. Move away.
110% LOL So, the Bible is
110% LOL
So, the Bible is 100% except for the Gospel of Peter, the Gospel of Mary, and the Gospel of Judas.
So, early Christians wrote at least twenty gospels that weren't included in the bible...[i] wonder why?
..
“Your assumptions are your windows on the world. Scrub them off every once in a while, or the light won't come in.”
― Isaac Asimov
And... "Christianity is
And...
"Christianity is called the religion of pity. Pity stands opposed to the tonic emotions which heighten our vitality: it has a depressing effect. We are deprived of strength when we feel pity. That loss of strength which suffering as such inflicts on life is still further increased and multiplied by pity. Pity makes suffering contagious." -- Nietzsche
Maybe?
LOL - "Your assumptions are your windows . . . . .
This from a "good christian" who invites me to his church in one post, and encourages me to drive a gasoline truck off a cliff in another. LOL!
Good christian = Huge hypocrite
I suggest you clean your own windows Igor Rebiblewitz.
Hey READER
All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
If you put your faith in people they will let you down everytime.
So if you're looking for an excuse to believe what you want then point out other people's flaws it isn't a hard thing to do.
And as far a judging goes Jesus judged the money changers in the temple who had turned the temple into a place of business and he drove them out with whips. So by example when a person sees an obivious wrong going about correcting it is not a sin or a judgement. It is called doing the right thing.