• Syndicate content

The debate

Ok, I'll break the ice on the presidential debate.

I watched it from home last night on my iPad, carrying it around the house with me while I admittedly did other things like the dishes.

I liked the president's poker face this time around. Last debate I thought there was too much furrowing.

Governor Mitt Romney was powerful and eager, but Obama was confident.

Twitter thought Bob Schieffer looked like a  pug, which I thought was mean. And people thought Romney's tie was ugly.

I didn't think Obama's arguments against Romney warranted his pointing out multiple times that the president was attacking him and not the issue.

Seemed like fair play since they're both vying for the same job.

I didn't get a sense that Romney has a stance on foreign policy that differs much from Obama's. Neither apparently believe killing other people is the answer.

Romney seemed to endorse Obama's views quite often, only adding that he's more zealous about them.

That situation doesn't provide for much animation in a foreign policy debate, so I guess Romney as a challenger is at a disadvantage from the start.

What did you think?

  • Comment

Comments (5)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
General Disarray
7464
Points
General Disarray 10/23/12 - 04:53 pm
3
9

Well

I did enjoy watching Obama make snippy little sarcastic remarks like our military not using bayonets or how he makes big decisions void of any politics. Bayonets are quite certainly still used by our military as are horses for that matter. And you're going to have a hard time convincing me the President ever does anything without thinking about the politics involved. EVER.

schultheis
702
Points
schultheis 10/23/12 - 08:13 pm
8
2

Fact check

Actual quote:

"I think Governor Romney maybe hasn't spent enough time looking at how our military works. You mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military's changed."

Fewer. Not no horses and bayonets. Fewer. Details, details.

And Eddie Munster's retort:

"10:50AM EDT October 23. 2012 - Count GOP vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan among those who didn't appreciate President Obama's debate line that the U.S. military has fewer "horses and bayonets."

"To compare modern American battleships and Navy with bayonets, I just don't understand that comparison," Ryan said in an interview that aired Tuesday on CBS' This Morning."

No, I am sure he does not understand. And that is either very sad or very disingenuous.

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 10/24/12 - 09:06 am
3
3

well

Unpublished

Obama has also blamed unemployment on ATMs.

We get what we vote for. Elections have consequences.

schultheis
702
Points
schultheis 10/23/12 - 08:02 pm
6
3

More actual highlights from the debate - poor Willard

"And then, only a few short minutes later, the Republican candidate for President of the United States of America, in a debate on foreign policy, said exactly this: "Syria is Iran's only ally in the Arab world. It's their route to the sea."

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, Willard Mitt Romney - a man who has been running for president since the Mesozoic Age, who has spent an enormous amount of money to surround himself with people who are supposed to explain stuff like geography to him - sat there on national television and showed us all that he still does not know how to read a map. Almost all of Iran's southern border verges on the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea, giving them plenty of access to, y'know, the sea...but even if that were not the case, Syria would not be Iran's "route to the sea" because of the giant chunk of land between them called Iraq."

BuzzBy
17777
Points
BuzzBy 10/24/12 - 07:44 am
4
6

I Said It Before

Unpublished

And I'll say it again
It is a shame that with 250 million people in the USA that these 2 are the best choices we can come up with to be POTUS. And it seems since the Nixon era the choice as been the lesser of two evils like who can do the least damage to the US in the next 4 years.

arkansasobserver
3065
Points
arkansasobserver 10/24/12 - 08:24 am
4
5

James Carville

To paraphrase James Carville, the 500lb gorilla in the room is still the economy, stupid! Both of these candidates have a record on economic issues, and it seems clear that the current direction is "not optimal."

I thought the third debate was boring and irrelevant.

i_wonder
27122
Points
i_wonder 10/24/12 - 09:07 am
2
3

remember folks

Unpublished

It's only the "other" political party that tells lies and makes mistakes.

Whichever party you support is flawless. Just remember that fact.

crypted quill
9968
Points
crypted quill 10/24/12 - 09:23 am
1
4

YEAH, RIGHT!"Lies and the

YEAH, RIGHT!

"Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them"

Fact: There are more ships being built under Obama than under THE G.W. BUSH.
And so on and so on...I LUV the so called fact-checking " Mostly True" "Half True" and "Mostly False"...B.S. bovine excrement.

'The whole party's been using the new fact set. The MSFC are simply beside themselves!
The MSFC?
Mainstream Fact-Checkers.'
-- DOONESBURY

Back to Top