• Comment

Editorial: Keystone XL Pipeline: Good or bad?

Posted: June 1, 2013 - 5:37pm

How many of you knew about the potential Keystone pipeline three months ago? Not many, we would assume.

The truth of the matter is that if the oil spill hadn’t happened in Mayflower in late March, the only interest in the proposed pipeline that could make its way through central Arkansas is in brief blips on a television news screen or in a press release from one of our representatives.

But the oil spill did happen. We still have people in and out of Mayflower disagreeing on the effects, the response and the future of the area. While many see the group from Exxon doing everything it can to help clean up the area and provide compensation for those directly involved, there are others who have seen that same group shielding us from certain areas of Faulkner County, slow to engage in serious questions about air and water quality.

And now comes the possibility of a new pipeline, a new chance for opportunity but also a new chance for major problems.

Let’s bypass the possibility of another oil spill. Chances are miniscule that anything like that catastrophe would happen in this area again. Of course that was what meteorologists told the people of Moore, Okla. 15 years ago. Things happen.

Let’s talk about what some people see as a positive: A better economy, increased jobs. Some estimated that there could be half a million jobs from Canada to Texas with more than 100,000 of those being permanent. But just before the Mayflower spill, a release from the state department sharply curtailed those numbers, placing non-permanent construction jobs at about 42,000 and actual permanent jobs at — get this — 35. That’s it.

But several polls in recent days have shown that more than two-thirds of Americans either support or somewhat support building the pipeline. We wonder how many of those people live in the Northwoods subdivision.

Want to know what the current administration thinks about it? Yeah, so do we. But it seems like President Obama has his hands full with IRS agents targeting conservative groups while Department of Justice officials tap into reporters’ phones.

So it looks like the House of Representatives, which is far more right-leaning than the Senate, could be trying to take the decision on the pipeline out of his hands. By approving legislation that would allow TransCanada to begin construction, Obama may not have a say in the matter. Of course, that piece of legislation is currently sitting on the Senate’s desk.

After reading this, you may think that the Keystone XL Pipeline is a horrible idea, certain to fail. But it’s not that simple. Although the pipeline would be transporting tar sands from Canada to the gulf for refinement, and although there is actually no real proof that the oil produced would be available for the United States, it is still a project that would be required to keep us using our main energy source.

Seriously, unless you want to make every day bike-to-work day, you and we need oil. And the tragedy that happened in our back yard might just make the construction of this new pipeline that much more safe, that much more by the book. We can only hope.

The truth is, this matter may not even be on our radar if the events that surrounded Mayflower hadn’t happened.

But they did. And so we’ll wait on this pipeline and hope for the best.

  • Comment
Comments (4) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Wild Turkey
73
Points
Wild Turkey 06/02/13 - 07:28 am
2
0
Keystone

The track record of fear-mongering for environmental issues is horrendous. The fears raised by Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" about the horrors of the use of DDT have been debunked but the legislation spawned by that lie is still in effect likely causing an increase in otherwise preventable diseases carried by insects.

From an interview with Gregory Bateson in Psychology Today:

"Bateson: 'Oppenheimer said, . . Anxiety, in fact, brings about the thing it fears. Creates its own disater'.

Goleman: So just let it happen?

Bateson: Well, be bloody careful about the politics you play to control it. You don’t know the total pattern; for all you know you could create the next horror by trying to fix up a present one."

Gregory Bateson, interviewed by Daniel Goleman, “Breaking out of the Double Bind,” Psychology Today, August 1978, p.51

I am one tired turkey with all the politics being played.

InsGuru
5241
Points
InsGuru 06/03/13 - 02:26 pm
1
0
Well

I'm more worried about the Ethanol in my gas than a job creating, market improving, new technology using pipeline.

How many people know about the harmful affects of Ethanol on their vehicles, it's effect at limiting gas mileage, ruining injectors (hope your vehicle isn't older than 2004, or you have a classic / collector car), aaaaannnddddddd other things.

Baba Fats
2
Points
Baba Fats 06/03/13 - 09:15 pm
0
0
Jobs and impact

Every estimate, other than those produced by big oil, has said that the Keystone XL will only produce about 4,500 jobs. Of those, only 50 will be permanent. Even the state department has said that this pipeline will have no impact, whatsoever, on the employment rate.
And as far as this oil helping America become self sufficient, it won't. Not in the least. Every drop of oil pumped from Canada to Texas has already been promised overseas. We won't see a drop of it. In fact, by building this pipeline, chances are better than not that domestic oil prices will increase a bit.
So we won't help the jobless rate, and we won't help anyone at the pump? Where's the upside to this pipeline?
That's not even to mention the environmental impact. The portion of this pipeline, that still runs through Canada, has spilled at least once a month since its construction. Why would it magically stop spilling once it crosses over the border? Trans Canada has even admitted that there will be less safety precautions on this line than on many other pipelines already in use. While other can detect a spill of up to 4 gallons/day, the XL won't even be able to detect a spill of over 250 gallons/day.

InsGuru
5241
Points
InsGuru 06/04/13 - 09:30 am
0
0
source?

Can you link your source(s) for this information?

Back to Top